memory

Cards (271)

  • who researched memory coding

    Alan Baddeley
  • memory coding experiment

    * alan baddeley gave four different lists of words to four groups of pp
    1 ) acoustically similar
    2 ) acoustically dissimilar
    3 ) semantically similar
    4 ) semantically dissimilar
    * pp had to recall the words in the correct order
  • memory coding findings

    * stm (immediately) - did worse when recalling acoustically similar words.
    this suggests stm is coded acoustically.
    the brain gets confused as the memory trace of each word is stored in a similar way and place.

    * ltm (time interval of 20 mins) - did worse when recalling semantically similar words.
    this suggests ltm is coded semantically.
    more confusion when words have a similar meaning because they have a similar memory trace and and would be activating a common schema.
  • who researched the stm capacity
    Joseph Jacobs
  • what did jacobs measure to find out what stm capacity is
    digit span
  • digit span experiment method
    1 ) researcher read four number digits to participants and they had to repeat them in the same order
    2 ) repeated this with more number digits until the pp couldn’t recall the correct order
    3 ) repeated this with letters
  • digit span experiment results
    * mean span for number digits = 9.3 items
    * mean span for letters = 7.3 items
  • advantages with jacobs experiment
    * can be standardised (repeated) meaning it has a high replicability
  • who observed the span of memory and chunking
    George Miller
  • what is believed to be the span of stm
    7 items, plus or minus 2
  • what is chunking
    grouping sets of letters or numbers into chunks/groups
  • how are words made
    via chunking
  • how can we increase what is recalled from our stm
    activate ltm to attribute meaning to items
  • who discovered the duration of stm

    Peterson and Peterson
  • what is thought to be the maximum duration of stm
    30 seconds
  • how did Peterson and Peterson discover the duration of stm
    1 ) give a nonsense consonant syllable to Pp (eg : YCG)
    2 ) afterward give the Pp a three digit number in which they have to count back in threes (interference task)
    3 ) on each trial they were stopped at various times (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 seconds)
    4 ) the Pp had to recall the consonant syllable
  • what was the point of the interference task in the Petersons’ experiment

    to stop any mental rehearsal of the consonant syllable
  • results of the duration of stm study

    * after 3 seconds - average recall was 80%
    * after 18 seconds - average recall was 3%
    * stm duration is around 18 seconds, unless information is repeated (rehearsal)
  • why is rehearsal needed to keep information in stm for longer than 30 seconds

    otherwise displacement in stm will occur due to the store having a limited capacity, so forgetting occurs
  • who studied the duration of ltm
    Henry Bahrick
  • how did bahrick test the duration of ltm

    1 ) collected 392 american participants (aged 17-74) and their high school year books
    2 ) gave two tests : photo-recognition, free recall (name everyone in graduation class)
  • what are the IVs in duration of ltm experiment

    1 ) photo-recognition test
    2 ) free recall test
    3 ) within 15 years of graduation
    4 ) after 48 years of graduation
  • results of duration of ltm study
    1 ) Pp within 15 years of graduating
    * photo-recognition = 90% accuracy
    * free recall = 60% accuracy
    2 ) Pp after 48 years of graduating
    * photo-recognition = 70% accuracy
    * free recall = 30% accuracy
    * some ltm lasts up to a lifetime
  • advantages of Bahricks study
    1 ) high in mundane realism = real life event (not an artificial setting)
    2 ) large sample = representative so can be generalised to some extent
  • disadvantages of Bahricks study

    culturally biased as all Pp are american
  • strength of Baddeley’s study

    shows a clear difference between memory stores
  • limitation of Baddeley’s study

    stimuli was artificial, not meaningful information so has a low mundane realism
  • problem with millers study
    may have overestimated the capacity of stm, the lower end may be more appropiate
  • disadvantage to Petersons study

    lacked external validity
  • advantages of Bahrick’s study

    high external validity as he investigated meaningful memories
  • memory processes
    encoding input
    capacity processing
    retrieval / cognitive output
  • what information passes into the sensory register
    stimuli from the environment
  • what process allows info to pass into stm
    attention
  • what process keeps information in stm
    maintenance rehearsal
  • what process lets information out of stm
    response (remembering)
  • what process passes info from stm to ltm
    prolonged rehearsal
  • what process passes info from ltm to stm

    retrieval
  • what may happen in prolonged rehearsal that leads to forgetting

    decay
  • what is the duration of the sensory register
    0.5 seconds
  • in what way does info pass from store to store
    linear