p3: nothing can exist over an omnipotent and omnibenevolent being
c1: evil, omnipotence and omnibenevolence form the IT so God and evil cannot coexist
a priori argument
p4: evil exists bc we experience it
c2: therefore God does not exist
The evidential problem of evil
A posteriori- evidence of evil makes belief in god unjustified
it is possible for a perfect god to exist that allows evil for loving reasons that are unknown to us but we have no evidence that god has these reasons
p1: we are only justified in believing what evidence suggests
p2: we only have evidence of imperfection
c1: we are only justified in believing that imperfection exists
c2: belif in perfectly good being is unjustified
Augustine’stheodicy
humans have a natural predisposition to sin so humanity is the case of evil
god is not responsible because evil cams from our free will
evil doesnt exist it is just a privation of good
Plantingas free will defence
Natural evil can be the result of:
The free will of satan
the free will of Adam and Eve
p says that without free will our lives would be value-less so the universe is better having value and evil rather then no value
p1: evil is the result of misused free will
p2:god can’t remove evil without removing free will
p3: life would be valueless without FW
c1: therefore it is better for evil to exist
c2: an all loving and all powerful God can therefore allow evil
eval of Augustine
strength:it is logical that god would allow evil as it is related to sin
the secret yet just judgement of god
science supports human corruption- SPE
weakness: it is not our fault we have OS so it is unjust and incompatible with an all loving god that we’d be punished eg.child with cancer cannot be labelled as justice for sinning
Evil inclination may be due to upbringing and not innate
Irenaeustheodicy
The fall was a necessary stage in the development towards perfection - punishment and evil is a way to help children mature