aim- to see if rehearsal was necessary to hold information in the short term memory store
peterson + peterson 1959- procedure
given trigrams
immediately asked to count backwards in sets of 3 for intervals of 3,6,9,12,15,18
why where participants asked to count backwards for peterson + peterson 1959
to prevent rehearsal
findings of peterson + peterson 1959
3seconds - 90% trigram recall
18seconds - 3% trigram recall
>18 seconds - virtually all information forgotten
concluded that information can't be held in the short term memory store without rehearsal
STM duration is 18-30seconds
what is displacement
when new information displaces or removes old information from the short term memory store
peterson + peterson 1959 (criticisms)
disadvantages:
lacks ecological validity (not reflected in other settings, meaning not reflected in real life) - this is as it is not a normal everyday task to memorise trigrams
lacks mundane realism (not realistic to real life, so harder to generalise) - because it was conducted in a controlled experimental setting (artificial)
may produce demand characteristics (conducting the experiment in a highly controlled environment allows participants to guess the aim)
advantages:
highly controlled setting means it can be easily replicated
what are trigrams
three letter constants with no meaning (eg HLG)
why are trigrams used
so no meaning can be attached, and therefore can't be semantically encoded to the short term memory store
why can't peterson and peterson 1959 results be generalised
the participants were university students, so not representative of whole population- meaning can't be generalised
peterson and peterson, may show effect of displacement due to counting backwards. this means the conclusions have low internal validity
Bahrick1975
392 american participants aged 17-74
took their highschool year books and asked the participants to recall people from their graduating class
two types of tests were used:
photo recognition (50 photos, some from year book, then had to name people)
free recall (had to recall names without any visual prompts)
results of bahricks study
within 15yrs graduation - 90% photo recognition, 60% free recall
after 48 years of graduation - 70% photo recognition, 30 free recall
meaning that long term memory may last up to a lifetime for some material, and free recall was less accurate than photo recognition
lab- high control, low external validity
field- low control, high external validity
disadvantages of bahricks study (1975)
lack of control of extraneous variables- the participants may be friends still with people from high school, may have looked over book in the past week etc.
lab studies- have poorer retention as they lack emotional attachment (eg peterson + peterson 1959)