Cards (9)

  • Justification
    • The statement is substantially true
    • Vast majority of the article is true
  • Contextual Truth
    • Number of defamatory statements are made within the same context of statements that are substantially true.
    • Defamatory statements do not further harm the reputation of the plaintiff.
  • Absolute Priviledge
    • Complete immunity from being sued in certain cases.
    • Defendant needs to prove that the defamatory material was published in relation to proceedings of parliament, parliamentary bodies, courts or tribunals.
  • Publication of public documents
    • The published material was a fair copy, summary or extract of a public document that is readily available.
    • Needs to be of public interest or for educational purposes.
  • Fair report of proceedings of public concern
    • Argue that material is essentially a fair report of proceedings that is published for information of the public or for educational purposes.
    • Parliamentary body, government, court, tribunal
    • Government inquiries, law reform bodies
    • Learned, professional, trade, sporting, or recreational associations
    • Company shareholders
  • Qualified Priviledge
    • Protects a person who has no malice in publishing information that is damaging to another person, and published it for various good reasons.
    • Believes person receiving information has a moral or legal interest in receiving the information
    • Person acts without malice or spite and acts reasonably in the circumstances
  • Honest opinion
    • Defendant may believe that the material is an expression of their honest opinion, rather than a statement of fact.
    • Information must be of public interest and opinion must be based on proper material (substantially true or relates to public documents)
  • Innocent Dissemination
    • Protects people who may unknowingly distribute defamatory material
    • Printing companies, booksellers, libraries, internet/email providers
    • Did not know that it contained defamatory material or did not have an obligation to check
  • Triviality
    Publisher can show that the plaintiff is unlikely to be harmed by the publication of the defamatory material.