Evaluation

• Quantitative approach


  One strength of Bem's work is that androgyny is measured quantitatively:

  • Useful when quantifying a dependent variable
  • However, Spence argues that qualitative methods are more useful
  • This suggests that both quantitative and qualitative methods may be useful for studying androgyny
• Valid and reliable


  A strength of the BSRI is that when it was developed it appeared to be valid and reliable:

  • Piloted by 1000 students, results corresponded with their own description of gender identity, demonstrating validity
  • Test-retest reliability demonstrated by a further test
  • Therefore, the BSRI was believed to be valid and reliable
• Counterpoint to valid and reliable


  • The BSRI was developed over 40 years ago and behaviours have changed since
  • The scale was devised by only people from the US
  • Therefore, the BSRI lacks temporal validity and generalisability, and may not be suitable for today
• Self-awareness


  A limitation of the BSRI is that people may not have an insight into their degree of femininity, masculinity or androgyny:

  • Likert scales require participants to have prior knowledge and understanding
  • The scoring system is subjective
  • Therefore, the BSRI may not be an objective, scientific way of assessing androgyny