Nature VS Nurture debate

Cards (8)

  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    The argument relating to the relative importance of nature or nurture’s influence on behaviours
  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    Nature-
    • born with behaviours - ‘inate’
    • hereditary, genes, DNA
    • nativist- agrees with the argument
    • e.g- biological explanation for OCD- genetics
  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    Nurture-
    • born as a blank slate - ‘tablua rasa’ Locke
    • emprinist- agrees with the argument
    • environment, observations, conditioning
    • e.g- social learning theory of Bandura’s Doll
  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    Heritability coefficient-
    • used to asses the nature vs nurture debate
    • range of 0-1, to shows the extent of which characteristics have a genetic basis
    • 1=100% genetically determined
  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    Interactionist approach-
    • development of the nature vs nurture debate
    • focuses on explaining behaviours due to their interactions between nature and nurture
    • holistic since it looks at both theories together
  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    examples-
    • 0.99- twin studies- biological, but no 100% statistics
    • 0.5- niche-picking- genes impact the selection of environments
    • 0.5- diathesis-stress model- DNA has the potential, but its triggered by events
    • 0- behaviourists- blank slate, all learnt
  • Nature VS Nurture debate-
    Strengths-
    • adoption studies- becoming more similar to birth parents- nature, similar to adoptive parents- nurture
    • banduras bodo doll- observations (nurture), gender specific (boys to men- testosterone=aggression)
    • application to treatments- drug therapy (nature), talking therapy (nurture), able to understand and help the causations
  • Nature VS Nurture debate
    weaknesses-
    • interactionsit approach- Niche-picking shows that they need to be studied together
    • interactionist approach- epigentics shows the nurture of previous generations
    • deterministic- nature is biological, nurture is environmental- negative social impact
    • reductionist- not looking at the whole approach