results are in totals in two or more named categories
this shows the number of times something occured
there are no scores for individual participants
likely to be collected from closed questions in self reports or from strucutred observations
for example: the number of people who helped or didnt help
data can be treated as ordinal
results are able to be placed in rank order (e.g. in positions such as 1st, 2nd and 3rd)
the difference between each rating, rank or score is not known as it is a non-scientific scale for example, coming 1st, 2nd, 3rd in a beauty contest
does not have to be equal for example, putting class test scores in rank order does not have to be equal 1st place could be 90/100 2nd 88/100 but 3rd 80/100
each participant has an individual score
data can be treated as interval/ratio
results are made up of numbers that come from a scientific scale of equal or known units
each participant has an individual score
interval data can go into negative values for example, temperature
ratio data has an absolute zero and so are often mathematical units for example, weight, distance or time
the term ratio data is not mentioned on the spec so we will assume that both types are covered under the term interval data
we can treat interval/ratio data as it is or treat it as ordinal or nominal(convert it)
ordinal can be treated as it is but can also be treated (converted) as nominal
nominal cannot be made more precise & so can only be treated this way
nominal data
strength:
easy to analyse
weakness:
does not allow for comparisons between participants
ordinal data
strengths:
allows for some comparison between participants, we can put participants in order from first to last
the data can be simplifies and treated as nominal data
weaknesses:
the date does not always allow us to see the difference between participants scores, only that someone has score better/worse than someone else
the data is measured in non-scientific units, such as strengths of beliefs, scores on a test etc.
interval data(and ratio data)
strengths:
provides measurement of participants in universally accepted units. this allows for detailed comparison between participants including from first to last and the difference between partcipants.
data can be simplifies and treated as ordinal and nominal
noweaknesses
mean
most suitable to use for data treated as interval/ratio but can also be used for date treated as ordinal
:) uses all of the raw data
:( is affected by extreme scores so may be misleading
median
most suitable for data treated as ordinal & can also be used for data treated as interval/ratio
:)not affected by extreme scores
:(can be distorted by small samples
mode
2 modes- bimodal
more than 2- multi modal
most suitable for data treated as nominal
:)not influenced by extreme scores and can show the most popular value
:( doesnt use all the date so may not be repesentative
range
highest - lowest +1 (for measurement error)
suitable for data treated as interval/ratio & ordinal
:) easy to calculate
:( can be influenced by extreme scores and so it may be misleading as it tells us nothing about the distribution of other scores
variance- tells us more baout the range. rather than looking at the extremes of the data set, the variance considers the difference between each data point and the mean, this is called the deviation
:) takes every score into account and is therefore not affected by outliers as much as the range
:( harder to caluclate the range + scores not in line
standard deviation- spread of data around the mean
helps us understand whether data is closely clustered around the mean or very spread out.
shares the same strengths and weaknesses of the variance in that it uses all of the data in the data set, but requires a fairly complex calculation with the range.