Point – One strength of Zimbardo’s study is that it used a realistic
Evidence – For example, McDermott (2019) argued that
participants behaved as if the study was real to them, with 90% of
conversations being focused on prison life.
Explanation – This is important because it suggests that the
environment created by Zimbardo is an accurate simulation of a
Link – This is a strength as it suggests the study was realistic, and
therefore higher in ecological validity.