Wiles takes an anti-realist approach to miracles: they are to be interpreted as symbols
Wiles believes the only miracle was that of creation
God's creation was good so there was no need for further intervention
God put the laws of nature in place, which meant that miraculous events would have to be rare as otherwise humans could not rely on those laws
the interventionist understanding of God is unacceptable
it implies a selective God who chooses to help some + not others
intensified by the fact that so many reported miracles seem trivial (e.g. water into wine) yet there was no miraculous deliverance from the gas chambers at Auschwitz
this would not be a God worthy of worship + makes the problem of evil unsolvable
the significance of Wiles' views in relation to religious belief
his views make the challenges of Hume irrelevant
Wiles gives a more holistic view of God's activity as opposed to a view that limits him to occasional intervention