Save
...
psych paper 2
approaches
comparison
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
grace sawtell
Visit profile
Cards (10)
compare approaches on views of development
psychodynamic -
clear
and
coherent
with
psychosexual
stages
cognitive -
child
development through
stages
and development of
schema
biological - development is due to
physical
elements
humanistic -
parents
have a role and
self
can be developed throughout
life
learning - happens in same way at any
stage
of life
compare approaches on views of nature vs nurture
learning - supports
nature
as humans are "
blank states
" and are products of
learning
and
upbringing
biological - supports
nature
as behaviour is caused by
physiological
processes affected by
genes
psychodynamic - supports
nature
(
innate
drives) and
nurture
(role of
upbringing
)
humanistic - supports
nature
(
self-actualise
) and
nurture
(relationship with
parents
)
cognitive - supports
nature
(
biological
processing) and
nurture
(
schemas
through environment)
compare approaches on views of reductionism vs holism
behaviourist -
reductionist
as behaviour is due to
stimulus-response
social learning -
less
reductionist as considers
cognition
biological -
very
reductionist as explains behaviour in terms of
chemicals
and brain
structure
psychodynamic -
quite
reductionist as behaviour is due to
primitive
drives but considers
upbringing
cognitive -
machine
reductionism as treats humans as
computers
but considers
cognitions
humanistic -
holistic
as considers range of
influences
compare approaches on views of determinism vs free will
behaviourist -
hard
determinism as due to
learning
processes outside of control
biological -
hard
determinism as due to brain
structure
,
genes
and
neurotransmitters
psychodynamic -
hard
determinism due to unconscious
drives
and
instincts
cognitive -
soft
determinism due to existing
schemas
and stages of
development
but some choice over
thoughts
social learning -
soft
determinism as guided by
learning
but choice over
actions
we perform
humanistic -
free will
as behaviour is down to
conscious
free choice
compare approaches on explanations of abnormal behaviour
behaviourist -
faulty
learning but treated by
counter-conditioning
social learning -
negative
and
dysfunctional
role models
psychodynamic -
unresolved
conscious
conflicts
and overuse of
defence
mechanisms but treated by
psychotherapy
cognitive -
faulty
and
irrational
thought processes but treated by
CBT
humanistic -
incongruence
between
concept
of self and
ideal
self but treated by
client-centred
therapy
biological - imbalance of
neurotransmitters
, genetic
inheritance
and faulty brain
structures
but treated through
drug
therapy
compare approaches on views of idiographic vs nomothetic
learning -
nomothetic
cognitive -
nomothetic
but uses case studies
biological -
nomothetic
but uses case studies
psychodynamic -
idiographic
humanistic -
idiographic
outline the nature vs nurture debate
behaviour is
innate
vs behaviour is due to
environment
outline the reductionism vs holism debate
breaking
down behaviour into
parts
vs considering a
range
of
factors
outline the determinism vs free will debate
behaviour
determined
by factors outside someone's
control
vs behaviour due to
conscious
free
choice
outline the idiographic vs nomothetic debate
studying and explaining
individual
behaviour through
case studies
vs studying
large
groups to establish
general
laws