judicial precedent

    Cards (31)

    • whats judicial precedent?

      past decisions of judges create law for future judges to follow, based on common law
    • whats the order of criminal court hierarchy?
      criminal cases
      court of appeal
      kings bench
      crown court
      magistrates court
    • what’s the hierarchy of civil court cases?
      civil cases
      court of appeal
      high court
      county court
      magistrates court
    • whats state decisis?

      to stand by what’s been decided
    • whats ratio deciendi ?

      Reason for the decision
    • what’s ober dicta?
      things said by the way or other things said
    • What is the principle of stare decisis?

      To stand by what has been decided.
    • What does 'ratio decidendi' refer to?

      The reason for the decision made by a judge.
    • What is the significance of 'obiter dicta' in legal decisions?

      It refers to comments made that are not crucial to the case outcome.
    • Since when has law reporting existed?
      Since the 13th century.
    • What was established in 1865 regarding law reporting?

      The Council of Law Reporting was set up to improve accuracy.
    • What are the types of precedents?
      1. Original precedent: A new point of law.
      2. Binding precedent: Must be followed by lower courts.
      3. Persuasive precedent: Not binding but can influence decisions.
      4. Courts lower in the hierarchy: Must follow decisions from higher courts.
    • What is an example of an original precedent?

      Donoghue v. Stevenson.
    • What is a binding precedent?

      A precedent from an earlier case that must be followed in later cases.
    • What does persuasive precedent mean?

      A decision that does not need to be followed but can influence a judge's decision.
    • What is the role of appellate courts?

      To hear appeals and decide laws.
    • What is the hierarchy of courts in relation to precedent?

      Every court is bound to follow decisions made by courts above it in the hierarchy.
    • What is the significance of the Supreme Court's decisions?

      They bind all lower courts.
    • What does the Practice Statement of 1966 allow?

      It allows the Supreme Court to depart from precedent when it seems right to do so.
    • What are the advantages and disadvantages of precedent?

      Advantages:
      • Consistency and fairness in similar cases.
      • Credibility of the law.

      Disadvantages:
      • Complexity and potential illogical decisions.
      • Time-consuming processes.
    • What is the role of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council?

      It provides judgments that may be followed but are not binding.
    • What is the significance of the case R v. Shivpuri?

      It established that one can attempt the impossible in law.
    • How does distinguishing work in legal precedent?

      It allows a judge to avoid applying a precedent by highlighting differences in facts.
    • What is the significance of the case Pepper v. Hart?

      It allowed the use of Hansard for statutory interpretation.
    • What does the term 'overruling' mean in legal context?

      When a higher court states that a previous decision was wrong.
    • What is the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in relation to national courts?

      Its points of EU law were binding on all national courts.
    • What is the current status of CJEU precedents after leaving the EU?

      We are no longer bound to follow precedents set by the CJEU.
    • How does the concept of 'distinguishing' affect legal decisions?

      It allows judges to differentiate cases based on specific facts, affecting the application of precedent.
    • What is the significance of the case R v. G (2003)?

      It overturned the objective test for recklessness established in Caldwell (1981).
    • What does the term 'precedent' refer to in law?

      A legal decision that serves as an example for future cases.
    • How does the hierarchy of courts affect the application of precedent?

      Lower courts must follow decisions made by higher courts, ensuring consistency in the law.
    See similar decks