A template for relationships which can affect the nature of future relationships
Hazan and Shaver (1987) - Aim
To test the internal working model
Hazan and Shaver (1987) - Method
Created a ‘love quiz’ in an American newspaper
Recorded 620 responses (205 men, 415 women) from a cross section of the population
The quiz asked about:
Current attachment experiences
Attachment history to identify current attachment types
Childhoodattachment types
Attitudes towards love
Hazan and Shaver (1987) - Findings
Attachment type distribution was like infants
A positive relationship between attachment type and love experience
Securely attached adults were happy, friendly and trusting - emphasised the importance of being able to accept and support their partner despite their faults
Also included a relationship between what their concept of love was and their attachment type - securely attached mostly had a positive internal working model
IWM explanation - Childhood friendships
Minnesota child-parent study (Sroufe et al 2005)
Supports Bowlby’s continuity hypothesis, finding a relationship between early attachment and later emotional/social behaviour
Securely attached infants have higher expectations that others are friendly and trusting, and this would enable easier relationships with their own children
IWM Explanation - Poor Parenting (Quinton et al 1984)
Compared a group of women who had been reared in institutions with a control group of women who had been brought up in their homes
Ex-institutional women later experiences difficulties as parents themselves, many put their children into care
The lack of internal working model means that the individual lacks a reference point to be able to form relationships with their own children
IWM Explanation - Romantic relationships
Hazan and Shaver found a distinct link between early attachment type and later relationships
Individuals who were securely attached had long lasting and romantic relationships
IWM Explanation - Mental health
A lack of attachment in a critical period would result in a lack of any internal working model
This may them lead to an attachment disorder with some of the following characteristics:
No preffered attachment figure
An inability to interact and relate to others
Experience severeneglect to frequent change of caregivers
Relationships in later childhood
Attachment type is associated with the quality of peer relationships in childhood
Securely attached infants form the best quality friendships whereas insecurely attached infants have friendship difficulties (Kerns 1994)
Myron-Wilson and Smith (1998) - Bullying behaviour can be predicted by attachment type:
Secure children were very unlikely to be bullies
Insecure-avoidant children were the most likely to be victims
Insecure-resistant were most likely to be bullies
Weakness - Research is correlational not causational
Research lacks causational evidence, therefore, we cannot claim That the relationship between early attachment and later love styles / relationships is one of cause and effect
Could there be other intervening variables? Kaganstemperament hypothesis?
Weakness - Issues with retrospective research
Recollections of early life may not be entirely accurate - longitudinal studies don’t support Hazan and Shavers findings.
Simpson et all (2007) - assessed infant attachment types aged 1
Those who were classified as securely attached infants were rated as having higher social competence later on, as well as being more expressive and more emotionally attached to their romantic partners
Weakness - Highly deterministic
Research is correlational so may lack in consideration of other factors / variables
Are we doomed to poor, emotionally dissatisfactoryrelationships if we do not form secure attachments
Many adults do go n to experience happy relationships despite not forming a secure attachment as an infant