The distress shown by an infant when seperated from their caregiver
Shaffer and Emerson (1960) - Aim
To understand the stages of attachment and how seperation anxiety changes over time
Shaffer and Emerson - procedure
60 infants, aged 5-23 weeks until a year, from working class homes in Glasgow were visited every 4 weeks
Seperation anxiety - each visit, the mother would report their infants response to seperation and stranger interaction, through intensity of protest and who it was directed to (using a four point scale)
Stranger anxiety - assessing infants response to interviewer at each visit
Findings - Stage 1
Pre-attachment / asocial attachment
Birth - 2 months
Produce a similar response to most objects, then begin to show preference to social stimuli
Reciprocity and Interactional Synchrony play an important role
Findings - Stage 2
Indiscriminate attachment
2-4 months
Infants start to become more social - preferring human company
Can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people
Do not show much anxiety with strangers
Findings - Stage 3
Discriminate attachment
7 months onwards
A distinctly different protest when put down (seperation anxiety)
Showing joy when reunited with that person (primary attachment figure)
Start to display stranger anxiety - intensely attached infants had mothers who responded quickly and sensitively to signals, where’s infants who showed no attachment had mothers who didn't respond to cues
65% of Shaffer and Emerson’s participants showed attachment to the mother
30% were joint attachment figures
Fathers were rarely the sole attachment, but 27% were joint first attachment
Findings - stage 4
Multiple attachments
As soon as the infant has formed their first attachment - they start to form a wider circle of attachments
Shaffer and Emerson found that within one month of forming an attachment, 29% of the infants formed attachments with others (secondary attachment)
Within 6 months, this figure had risen to 78%
Shaffer and Emerson (1960) - Conclusion
By a year, most infants have developed multiple attachments - 1/3 developed five or more secondary attachments
Seperation anxiety can occur with e=secondary attachments
Weakness - Unreliable data
The data is unreliable as its based on mothers reports of their infant - some may be more or less sensitive to their childs needs
This creates symptomatic bias - reducing validity
Weakness - Biased sample
Working class population - results cannot be applied to a wider population / carry ecological validity
More women care for children as opposed to men
Weakness - Cultural representation
The study reflects an individualistic culture, rather than a collectivist one - they’re more concerned with the needs of themselves rather than the community
In a collectivist culture - communities share childcare and would therefore bring entirely different results
Weakness - Stage Theories
This type of theory suggests development is inflexible and therefore not relevant or applicable to many
states that we form attachment before multiple - whereas in many cases its the other way around
This may then set a standard process for development - and others are considered abnormal