A pure monopoly exists when there is only one firm in a market
A legal monopoly exists when there is one firm in the market with over 25% market share
Characteristics of a monopoly:
Economists' model for a monopoly assumes there is one dominant firm in the market
High barriers to entry and exit due to legal barriers, high levels of sunk costs, internal economies of scale and brand loyalty
Monopolies are usually profit maximisers
Monopolies produce outcomes that are allocative inefficient as they exploit customers, they are also productively inefficient
Monopolies can also be X-Inefficient as they may become complacent in the production process
Monopolies however can become dynamically efficient since supernormal profit may be made in the long run
Monopoly evaluation:
Monopolies are heavily regulated
Supernormal profit may not be used for reinvestment
Profit maximisation may not be the objective of all monopolies
Monopolies don't mean there isn't any competition
Natural monopolies would mean one firm SHOULD exist only
The diseconomies/economies of scale arguments are significant however the monopolists' production on the average cost curve is the determinant of what argument holds
A natural monopoly occurs when it's naturally most efficient for there to be only one firm in the market, they will experience huge internal economies of scale and so it makes no sense for any firms to compete