L27 - Exercise & Psych Well-Being 2: Anxiety

Cards (27)

  • Anxiety:
    • Is a response of stress (when feel like don't have ability to overcome that stress)
    • “ State of worry, apprehension or tension that often occurs in the absence of real or obvious danger
    • Shows both psychological & physiological responses
    • Experience in brain; increase HR & BP
  • Anxiety:
    • When are constantly worried, afraid or panicking about things that might happen or for no reason at all
    • During 2020 lockdown - 15.6% of NZ respondents reported moderate to high anxiety; younger fared worse
    • Mental health issue with prevalence in NZ
  • Anxiety:
    • Research examines
    • Clinical anxiety
    • In terms of chronic exercise for it to improve (similar to depression)
    • Non-clinical anxiety
    • Not a disorder (not chronic), lesser severity, can have one off session to decrease anxiety
    • Anxiety more complicated than depression, has many different types/disorders
  • Anxiety:
    • Treatment
    • Medication, therapy
    • PA?
    • Don’t necessarily need increased fitness just increase PA
  • PA & Anxiety:
    • Correlational studies - Prevention
    • Those who spend > total time in moderate to vigorous PA → 15–34% lower chances of presenting anxiety symptoms
    • Being regularly PA provides a buffer against anxiety symptoms & disorders
    • But those with > anxiety symptoms are less likely to be PA OR Active people use PA as a means of regulating anxiety?
    • What came first, cause & affect relationship not fully established
  • PA & Anxiety:
    • RCT Intervention Evidence
    • Clinical populations
    • Similar in non-clinical
    • Variability in data, some respond better than others
    • Non-clinical populations
    • PA has a significant, small-medium reductive effect on anxiety
  • PA & Anxiety Study Problems:
    • Fewer studies on anxiety and PA relationship (conclusions less confident)
    • Can't make strong conclusions as different ExRx have different effects/results
    • Lot of methodical flaws in study
    • Small sample size
    • Some already low levels of anxiety (need anxious people to show effect)
    • Not enough research for it to be recommended
  • PA & Anxiety Study Problems:
    • Don't use control groups (need them to see that PA is better), something else could have effect
    • Expectation effect - come into study with expectation (participants & researcher) - just report what researchers want
    • Hard to blind someone to exercising vs not exercising
    • Control by having another exercise condition (eg yoga) as control group
  • Acute PA & Non-Clinical Anxiety:
    • Aerobic Exercise
    • State anxiety after exercise
    • Anxiety reduction lasts 2-4 hrs post-exercise
    • Effects of exercise similar to quiet rest or relaxation BUT exercise effects lasted longer
  • Acute PA & Non-Clinical Anxiety:
    • Expectancy bias is inevitable in almost all studies
    • Can’t blind them to/from exercise
    • Muscle strengthening exercise
    • High intensity (>70% 1RM) less likely to reduce anxiety than moderate or low (50-70% 1RM)
  • Acute PA & Non-Clinical Anxiety
    • Intensity: Moderate intensities more beneficial, high may cause increase anxiety (but this could be a measurement issue)
    • Way measure anxiety
    • Physiological responses such as increase HR, BP
    • Higher arousal is being assumed to be anxiety
    • High intensity = physiological systems experience when anxious, could negatively reflect them (psych)
    • Duration: Seems to be unimportant; but a “minimally effective dose of exercise” still to be established
    • PA guidelines? guidelines seem to work for depression
  • Acute PA & Non-Clinical Anxiety:
    • Strong conclusions for this
    • Graph above 0 to right = pos affect to exercise
    • What we don’t know is greater than what we do know
    • Optimal ExRx & minimal dose
  • PA & Affect:
    • Affect is a general overview of how we feel
    • Takes into account our moods & emotions
    • Moods: not specifically connected to situation or event
    • Longer lasting
    • Emotions: response/reaction to something/situation
    • Negative affect = feeling bad/unpleasant
    • Positive affect = feeling great/pleasant; generally feeling awesome
  • PA & Affect:
    • Promoting psychological well-being
    • Affect is easily measured (feeling scale)
    • Can use across exercise experience (before, during, after) to show affect
    • Can also use in control groups (non-exercising)
  • Influence of exercise intensity on affect:
    • Exercise intensity has the strongest influence on how we feel during exercise
    • Intensity = strongest effect on affect
    • To maximise psych well-being we need to understand the exercise intensity = affective response relationship
  • Influence of exercise intensity on affect:
    • Study 1:
    • Average of all participants
    • Feel more positive after
    • Individual response
    • Half had neg response
    • Half had pos response
    • So average was cancelled out
  • Influence of exercise intensity on affect:
    • Study 2:
    • Compared moderate vs high intensity + individual differences
    • Average moderate intensity not much change (42% pos response)
    • High intensity average = mostly neg response (79%)
    • Post-ex rebound → feel better after exercise
  • Influence of exercise intensity on affect:
    • After exercising, we feel better than we did before - regardless of the exercise intensity
    • All intensities make us feel good after
    • NO universal exercise intensity will produce the most positive affect during exercise in all individuals - it’s a complicated relationship
  • Influence of exercise intensity on affect
    • Importance of COGNITIVE APPRAISAL
    • Of physiological symptoms
    • Focus on attention
    • If comfortable less physiological response & vice versa
    • High intensity physiological symptoms so intense cause neg affect in most (focus on how feeling)
    • Of psychological factors
    • Your ability (self confidence, sense of achievement)
    • Your motivation (what do I want to get out of this?)
    • Need to match intensity to individual cognitive appraisal
    • Cognitive appraisal differs with exercise experience
    • At HIGH intensity exercise, physiological symptoms dominate
    • Why feel negative
  • Importance of Cognitive Appraisal:
    • Why “prescribe”? Let people choose!
    • Reduce variability more have positive affect
    • Intensity is physiologically beneficial & ‘most’ feel good
    • 26% didn’t know what intensity so didn’t feel good
    • Affected if you get your prescription wrong even by 10%
    • Enough to have neg affect
    • Reminded to feel good → more pos response (+ve), intensity the same (64-76% HR max)
  • Importance of Cognitive Apprasial study:
    • 1 reminded to feel good (affect more positive) - telling/reminding them increases affect(tricks psych)
  • Why does affect matter?
    • It’s a component of psychological well-being
    • Has a motivational force: people do things that make them feel good & avoid what makes them feel bad

  • Why does affect matter?
    • Neg experience = neg affective forecasting
    • That run was horrible I won't be doing that again
    • Pos experience = pos affective forecasting
    • I felt great during that weight class. Sign me up for the next one!
    • More important for inactive people; 1 bad experience has more effect to put untrained off of exercise

  • Why does affect matter?
    • Affective forecasting: thinking about how you will feel to decide whether or not to participant
    • If remember feeling shit will think will next time; more pos if had pos experience
    • Only influenced from how felt during not after
    • Need to ensure exercise makes people feel good!
    • More important for inactive people; 1 bad experience has more effect to put untrained off of exercise
  • Affective forecast & response from one exercise session to the next:
    • With experience our forecast may get more accurate
    • When 1st come in assume the worst - neg forecast
    • But as get better/more pos experience get more pos affective forecasting
    • With experience most (but not everyone) feel ‘ better ’ at the same intensity
  • Affective forecast & response from one exercise session to the next:
    • Individual variability
    • Some felt better on 2nd time round; some had neg experience
  • Why is this all important:
    • Understanding the psych benefits of PA is as important as knowing the physical benefits
    • The exercise intensity - affective response relationship is complicated
    • All intensities have the potential to reduce affect during exercise → implications for PWB & motivation
    • Understand the individual’s experience of exercise - how are they appraising it? Can you alter that appraisal?