Save
...
Tort
Rylands v Fletcher
Defences
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Jessica Admans
Visit profile
Cards (5)
Consent
no
liability
where the
claimant
has consented to the thing that is accumulated by the
defendant
Act of a stranger (
Perry v Kendricks
)
if a stranger over whom the defendant has no control has been the cause of the escape causing the damage, then the defendant may not be
liable
Act of God
(
Nichols v Marsland
)
extreme weather conditions that 'no human foresight can provide against'
Contributory negligence
(
Ponting v Noakes
)
where the claimant is partly responsible for the escape of the thing
Statutory authority
(
Charing cross electricity v Hydraulic
)
if the terms of an act of parliament authorise the
defendants
actions, this may amount to a defence - must check what act says