we can understand the idea behind them- statements are meaningful
what analogy did he propose?
toys in the cupboard
what did he say?
falsification principle does not work for all statements but they can still be meaningful because we can understand the idea behind them.
what is his toy in thre cupboard analogy?
We can never prove that toys do not come out of the toy cupboard and move around when we are not watching them. We might not be able to falsify whether or not the toys move, but we still understand the idea of toys moving.
