neural and hormonal explanations

    Cards (5)

    • what is a strength of the neural explanation?
      • Research support 
      • Kluver and Bucy 
      limbic areas were removed from monkeys 
      • When removed the monkeys showed a lack of emotional responses associated with situations that normally stimulate fear or anger.  
      • Shows a strong association netween neural pathways that have been linked to aggression 
      • Shows that the limbic system is hugely important in the regulation of aggression.
    • limitation of research support for neural explanation?
      • Difficulty in extrapolating animal findings to humans 
      • Cannot be sure that limbic system in animals and humans are the same 
      • Therefore
      • Should be cautious when generalising animal studies to humans 
    • strength of hormonal explanation
      • Research support  
      • Role of testosterone 
      • When mice are castrated it leads to a reduction in aggression in the mice. 
      • Suggests a clear link between this hormone and levels of aggression 
      • Could be why men are more aggressive then women 
      • Furthermore, 
      • Suggests that aggression peaks in males in their teenage years  
      • Provides a link between testosterone and aggression since testosterone peaks during teenage years 
      • Makes the hormonal explanation more credible 
    • limitation for explanations
      • Falls firmly on the side of nature. 
      • Both explanations focus on biological factors (limbic system and hormones
      • A problem is they fail to consider other important factors e.g. observational learning, social learning theory. 
      • Ignored other reasonable explanations  
      • E.g. Bandura’s Bobo Doll 
      • Neural and hormonal explanations limit our understanding of aggression 
      • Assumes that individuals have a predisposition to aggression due to their biology.  
      • All behaviour is an interaction of many factors which may trigger aggressive responses 
    • limitation of explanations
      • Negative implications on the real world 
      • Criminal justice system 
      • Could be argued that their aggressive criminal behaviour is due to biological factors
      • Leads to reduced sentences or unfair judgments being passed.  
      • Links to how the explanations are biologically deterministic as they suggest one has no control over their aggressive behaviour and there is nothing they can do.  
      • Whereas they could change their environment in order to change behaviour and not be aggressive 
      • Shows the damage that explanations can have in explaining aggressive behaviour