When removed the monkeys showed a lack of emotional responses associated with situations that normally stimulate fear or anger.
Shows a strong association netween neural pathways that have been linked to aggression
Shows that the limbic system is hugely important in the regulation of aggression.
limitation of research support for neural explanation?
Difficulty in extrapolating animal findings to humans
Cannot be sure that limbic system in animals and humans are the same
Therefore,
Should be cautious when generalising animal studies to humans
strength of hormonal explanation
Research support
Role of testosterone
When mice are castrated it leads to a reduction in aggression in the mice.
Suggests a clear link between this hormone and levels of aggression
Could be why men are more aggressive then women
Furthermore,
Suggests that aggression peaks in males in their teenage years
Provides a link between testosterone and aggression since testosterone peaks during teenage years
Makes the hormonal explanation more credible
limitation for explanations
Falls firmly on the side of nature.
Both explanations focus on biological factors (limbic system and hormones)
A problem is they fail to consider other important factors e.g. observational learning, social learning theory.
Ignored other reasonable explanations
E.g. Bandura’sBobo Doll
Neural and hormonal explanations limit our understanding of aggression
Assumes that individuals have a predisposition to aggression due to their biology.
All behaviour is an interaction of many factors which may trigger aggressive responses
limitation of explanations
Negative implications on the real world
Criminal justice system
Could be argued that their aggressive criminal behaviour is due to biological factors
Leads to reduced sentences or unfair judgments being passed.
Links to how the explanations are biologically deterministic as they suggest one has no control over their aggressive behaviour and there is nothing they can do.
Whereas they could change their environment in order to change behaviour and not be aggressive
Shows the damage that explanations can have in explaining aggressive behaviour