To investigate the effects of social influence on an individual's decision-making process
Asch'sprocedure for conformity research
Recruit participants, assign to groups of 8, present with cards and lines, ask for shortest line, have one confederate give incorrect answer, record responses, repeat for 12 cards
Findings
74% of participants conformed at least once, 26% of participants never conformed,participants conformed 32% of the time.
Asch’s Ethical Issues
there was no informed consent, participants may have felt anxious, they were deceived
Generalisability
all male, all American, is a weakness as females may have different conformity levels
Ecological validity
Artificial setting, so they may have chose incorrect answer due to embarrassment but may not in real life situations
Waters and Hans (2009)
1/3 of 3500 said that if voted privately they would have voted against the majority decision
Group size
one confederate 3%, two confederates 13%, three to fifteen32%
Unanimity
conformity decreased to 5% when there was a dissenter.
Task difficulty
Increased conformity when the task was more ambiguous
Supporting evidence
Lucas at al 2006, found more conformed when problems were harder