Deffenbacher (1983) found the stress-performance relationship follows an inverted-U function (Yerkes Dodson Curve), where performance increases with stress up to an optimal point and then declines.
Clifford and Scott (1978) found individuals who witnessed a violent attack remembered fewer details about the event compared to a control group who saw a less stressful version.
Yuille and Cutshall (1986) conducted a study on witnesses of a real-life incident and found that recall accuracy of a stressful event involving weapons was remarkably accurate, even after a long time.
The study by Yuille and Cutshall suggests that there are cases where memory for an anxious/stressful event can be accurate, even months later.
According to the Yerkes-Dodson Law, an increase in arousal improves performance but only up to a point. Once arousal has passed a critical point called the optimum, performance tends to decline.
Clifford and Scott (1978) found that witnesses to violent incidents generally recall less than witnesses to non-violent incidents, regardless of whether a weapon was used or not.
Clifford & Hollin (1981) examined the relationship between the level of violence and recall. They found that the higher the level of violence depicted, the poorer participants' recall of an assault.
Loftus (1975) suggested when a person witnesses a crime in which a weapon was used, their attention tends to focus on the weapon.
Loftus (1975) coined the term weaponfocus.
When anxiety/ arousal is too extreme or too little, memoryaccuracy will be reduced.
Anxiety can have a positive effect on accuracy of memory.
Christianson & Hubinette (1993) questioned 58 witnesses of real-life bank robberies in Sweden4-15months after the event and found that those threatened in some way (high anxiety) had improved recall and remembered more details.
Yuille & Cutshall (1986) reported that witnesses were accurate even 4-5months after an event.