With observations, we do not manipulate variables (or control over extraneous variables)
Therefore, cause and effect relationships cannot be established
Types of Observations- Covert:
COVERED
Group being studied donot know they are being observed (undercover research e.g. JamesPatrick & Glasgow Gang)
STRENGTHS: Investigatoreffects are unlikely- participants behaviour is genuine
WEAKNESSES: Issues & Concerns around informedconsent / deception
Types of Observations- Overt:
OPEN
Researcher tells participants that they are conducting research (participants know they are being observed)
STRENGTHS: Consent can be obtained
WEAKNESSES: Hawthorneeffect
Hawthorne Effect: Participants know that they are being watched so they change their behaviour
TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS- CONTROLLED:
Behaviour is observed under controlled laboratory conditions (E.g. Bandura’s bobodoll study)
STRENGTHS: Can be easily replicated (can test for reliability), Quantitative Data- easier / quicker to analyse (than natural), Quick to conduct, many can be done in a short amount of time (representative so can be generalised to a large population)
WEAKNESSES: Can lack validity-Hawthorne effect
Natural Observations:
Spontaneousbehaviour is recorded in a natural setting
STRENGTHS: Behaviour is observed in its own setting- greater ecological validity
WEAKNESSES: Observations are done on a smallscale (unrepresentative) , less reliable as other variables cannot be controlled (hard to repeat)
TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS: PARTICIPANT:
Observer- has directcontact with the group of people they are observing
STRENGTHS: The researcher can obtain in-depthdata (near to the participants so are unlikely to overlook / miss any behaviours)
WEAKNESSES: EvaluationApprehension (researcher’s presence might influence participant’s behaviour), Difficult to get time / privacy for recording (have to rely on memory), Researcher becomes too involved- lose objectivity, become biased)
TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS- NON-PARTICIPANT:
Researcher doesn’t have directcontact with the people being observed
STRENGTHS: Investigatoreffects & EvaluationApprehension are less likely (can’t see researcher)
WEAKNESSES: Lack of proximity- might overlook / miss some behaviours
OBSERVATIONAL DESIGN:
Applies to STRUCTURED observations ONLY
How to classify / record the data (may involve a sampling method)
EVENT SAMPLING:
Researcher decides which types of behaviour they are interested in & recordsalloccurrences
Ignores all other types of behaviour
TIME SAMPLING:
Observation occurs only during specified time periods e.g. 10 mins every hour
The occurrence of the specified behaviour is recorded during that timeperiodonly
Assessing Reliability- Inter-observer:
Researchers observe the SAMEBEHAVIOURSINDEPENDENTLY (to avoid BIAS)
Data is COMPARED and CORRELATE
0.8+ or more would suggest RELIABILITY
Validity (external)
Less awareness
More natural & normal situation
More realistic behaviour
3 decisions to be made:
Covert or Overt
Natural or Controlled
Non-participant or participant
Behavioural Categories:
Psychologists must decide which behaviours should be examined
Breaking targetbehaviour (e.g. aggression) into components that can be observed & measured (e.g. hitting / kicking)