OBSERVATIONS

Cards (15)

  • Observations- Key notes:
    • With observations, we do not manipulate variables (or control over extraneous variables)
    • Therefore, cause and effect relationships cannot be established
  • Types of Observations- Covert:
    • COVERED
    • Group being studied do not know they are being observed (undercover research e.g. James Patrick & Glasgow Gang)
    • STRENGTHS: Investigator effects are unlikely- participants behaviour is genuine
    • WEAKNESSES: Issues & Concerns around informed consent / deception
  • Types of Observations- Overt:
    • OPEN
    • Researcher tells participants that they are conducting research (participants know they are being observed)
    • STRENGTHS: Consent can be obtained
    • WEAKNESSES: Hawthorne effect
  • Hawthorne Effect: Participants know that they are being watched so they change their behaviour
  • TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS- CONTROLLED:
    • Behaviour is observed under controlled laboratory conditions (E.g. Bandura’s bobo doll study)
    • STRENGTHS: Can be easily replicated (can test for reliability), Quantitative Data- easier / quicker to analyse (than natural), Quick to conduct, many can be done in a short amount of time (representative so can be generalised to a large population)
    • WEAKNESSES: Can lack validity- Hawthorne effect
  • Natural Observations:
    • Spontaneous behaviour is recorded in a natural setting 
    • STRENGTHS: Behaviour is observed in its own setting- greater ecological validity
    • WEAKNESSES: Observations are done on a small scale (unrepresentative) , less reliable as other variables cannot be controlled (hard to repeat)
  • TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS: PARTICIPANT:
    • Observer- has direct contact with the group of people they are observing
    • STRENGTHS: The researcher can obtain in-depth data (near to the participants so are unlikely to overlook / miss any behaviours)
    • WEAKNESSES: Evaluation Apprehension (researcher’s presence might influence participant’s behaviour), Difficult to get time / privacy for recording (have to rely on memory), Researcher becomes too involved- lose objectivity, become biased)
  • TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS- NON-PARTICIPANT:
    • Researcher doesn’t have direct contact with the people being observed
    • STRENGTHS: Investigator effects & Evaluation Apprehension are less likely (can’t see researcher)
    • WEAKNESSES: Lack of proximity- might overlook / miss some behaviours
  • OBSERVATIONAL DESIGN:
    • Applies to STRUCTURED observations ONLY
    • How to classify / record the data (may involve a sampling method)
  • EVENT SAMPLING:
    • Researcher decides which types of behaviour they are interested in & records all occurrences
    • Ignores all other types of behaviour
  • TIME SAMPLING:
    • Observation occurs only during specified time periods e.g. 10 mins every hour
    • The occurrence of the specified behaviour is recorded during that time period only
  • Assessing Reliability- Inter-observer:
    • Researchers observe the SAME BEHAVIOURS INDEPENDENTLY (to avoid BIAS)
    • Data is COMPARED and CORRELATE
    • 0.8+ or more would suggest RELIABILITY
  • Validity (external)
    • Less awareness 
    • More natural & normal situation
    • More realistic behaviour
  • 3 decisions to be made:
    • Covert or Overt
    • Natural or Controlled
    • Non-participant or participant
  • Behavioural Categories:
    • Psychologists must decide which behaviours should be examined
    • Breaking target behaviour (e.g. aggression) into components that can be observed & measured (e.g. hitting / kicking)