This definition focuses on what is helpful and desirable for the individual, rather than the other way round.
This view is very subjective and interpretation depends on the observer.
This definition can vary over time and between cultures or communities.
Most people do not meet all of the criteria all of time, yet we do not say they are abnormal.
The criteria outlined by Jahoda makes ideal mental health practically impossible to achieve.
The criterion of autonomy makes the collectivist cultures, where the greater good and helping/ relying on others is encouraged, seems abnormal.
As most western cultures are individualists, the criteria outlined by Jahoda seem a reasonable fit, but non-western cultures cannot relate to criteria.
The criteria that Jahoda outlines is vague and is therefore very difficult to measure.
This is a holistic definition as it focuses on the individual.
The definition can be used to help people become more self-aware and set their own goals in life.
Most people do not reach self-actualisation, but we do not call them abnormal.
Jahoda'scriteria set very high standards for people to achieve in life.