The innocence project- 72%of cases where only ewt was used have been released due to DNA evidence (wrongly convicted)
Loftus + Palmer 1
investigated leading questions
45 students watched 7 clips of traffic accidents (in a lab)
Then answered a questionnaire with one critical question
“How fast were the cars going when they hit/crashed/collided with each other?”
Loftus and Palmer 1 results
smashed = 40.8 MPH
contacted = 31.8 MPH
Loftus and Palmer 2 (AO1)
new set of Ppts - same experiment as 1
1 week later, smashed + hit were called back and asked 1 critical question “did you see any broken glass“
Smashed = 16/50 said yes
Hit = 7/50 said yes
Leading question affect post-event memory (had been stored for 1 week)
Post Event Discussion
Discussing an event after changes that memory
Gabbert- Group 1 - watched a clip about same event , 1/2 group 1 and 2 did immediate recall and the remaining discussed the event and then recalled. This was 70% accurate
shows false memories
AO3 Strength - “Bugs Bunny”
strength of Loftus and palmer
College students that had visited Disney before 10years old were given advertising info about Disney with bugsbunny (not a Disney character) and Ariel ( didn’t exist yet).
when asked to recall their time at Disney, many reported seeing bugs + Ariel - lab study - high control, clear to see cause and effect
AO3 weakness - “Bugs Bunny” + loftus and palmer
lab study - lacks mundane realism
Ppts knew they were in a study, were prepared to watch a screen
Not reflective of real life - no anxiety - may impact our memory
AO3 weakness - Yuille + Cutshall
real bank robbery - high ecological validity
People interviewed immediately then agreed to be interviewed 4 months later
2 leading questions - their statements matched
Leading questions do not effect memory
Individual differences
age = elderly + children prone to effects of leading questions