a strong enduring emotional bond between 2 people in which each seeks closeness & feels more secure when in presence of attachment figure
reciprocal
3 characteristics of attachment?
proximity
separation distress
secure base behaviour
proximity?
when infants try stay physically close to those whom they are attached to
separation distress?
infants are distressed when attachment figure leaves their presence
secure base behaviour?
even when we are independent of our attachment figures we tend to make regular contact with them
define reciprocity?
when infantresponds to action of another person/action of infant elicitsresponse from another - turntaking
define interactional synchrony?
mother & infantreflect both actions & emotions of the other in a coordinatedway - mirroring actions of another person
reciprocity - jaffe 1973?
showed that infants coordinated their actions with caregivers in a kind of convo
from birth babies move in a rhythm when interacting with adult almost as if takingturns
from around 3monthsinteraction tends to be frequent & involves closeattention to each others verbalsignals & facial expressions
interaction is reciprocal when each person responds to other & elicits a response from them
helps to reinforce attachment bond
interactional synchrony - meltzoff & moore 1977?
aim - examine cg infantinteractions
method - observed beginnings of i.s in infants as young as 2weeks
adult displayed 1/3facialexpressions or 1/3distinctivegestures
childs response was filmed & identified by independentobservers
found association between expressionadult had displayed & actions of baby
3 X of caregiver - infant interactions?
problems with testing infant behaviour
culturallybiased research
observations describe behaviour do not explain from feldman2012
2 * of caregiver - infant interactions?
research conducted using controlled observations
evidence to suggest imitative behaviour forms basis for social development from meltzoff2005
X problem testing infant behaviour?
infants mouth are in constant motion
expressions tested for may be confused with other movements rather than synchrony
e.g tongue thrust reflex babies are born with includes sticking tongue out
difficult to distinguish between generalphysical activity & imitation
? internal
not certain these expressions are in direct response to cg
cannot accurately measure extent to which they reinforce att bond due to confounding variables
X culturally bias research?
reciprocity & i.s found in western cultures
e.g reported that kenyan mothers have little interaction with their kids but still go onto form normal att
? population
these cg interaction not essential for att in all countries
findings cannot be generalised to att in wider population
* research used controlled observations?
observations of mother - infant interactions well controlled & filmed so fine details can be recorded & analysed
babies do notknow they are being observed/understandpurpose of research so behaviour is natural
reliable & valid
rm used are wellcontrolled & standardised
allows for replicability
nature of sample means no risk of dcs influencing results
increases ecological validity
X observations do not explain behaviour?
feldman 2012 points out that r & i.s simply describe behaviours that occur
does not tell us purpose of these behaviours that babies demonstrate
? internal
observational methods used to identify these interactions do not explain why infant behaves this way
cannot establish cause & effect relationship between infants behaviour & formation of att bond
* imitative behaviour forms basis for social development
meltzoff2005 believes that by imitating cg behaviourassociating their own actions with this behaviour & then projecting their internal experiences onto others infants begin to understand mental state of others
reseach into r & i.s explains how children begin to understand what others think & feel
fundamental for conducting social relationship
evidence to support that these aspects of cg infant interactions are essential for forming & reinforcing att bond