Milgram's Situational Variables Affecting Obedience

    Cards (20)

    • What does proximity refer to in the context of Milgram's study?
      Proximity refers to how close to or far away someone or something is.
    • How does proximity affect destructive obedience according to Milgram?
      Destructive obedience is more easily achieved if the person being harmed is out of sight.
    • What was Milgram's hypothesis regarding obedience and proximity?
      Milgram hypothesized that obedience decreases as proximity increases.
    • What was the effect on obedience when the Teacher and Learner were in the same room?
      Obedience dropped from 65% to 40% when they were in the same room.
    • What happened when the Teacher had to force the Learner's hand onto the shock plate?
      Obedience dropped to 30% in this variation.
    • What was the outcome when the experimenter issued instructions by phone?
      Obedience dropped to 20.5% when instructions were given by phone.
    • What conclusion did Milgram draw about proximity and destructive obedience?
      Milgram concluded that proximity is a key variable in destructive obedience.
    • What does uniform signify in the context of obedience?
      Uniform signifies authority and increases the likelihood of obedience.
    • What did Bickman's research in 1974 demonstrate about uniforms?
      Bickman's research showed that people were more likely to obey a confederate dressed as a security guard than in plain clothes.
    • How is obedience culturally transmitted according to the study material?
      Obedience is taught both directly and indirectly through cultural and societal norms.
    • What role does social hierarchy play in obedience?
      Most cultures operate a social hierarchy where authority figures are expected to be obeyed.
    • What was the uniform worn by the experimenter in Milgram's original study?
      The experimenter wore a grey lab coat.
    • What happened when the original experimenter was replaced by a man in plain clothes?
      Only 20% of participants went up to 450 volts in this variation.
    • What conclusion did Milgram reach regarding uniforms and obedience?
      Milgram concluded that a uniform confers authority and results in higher levels of obedience.
    • What is one factor that explains obedience in Milgram's original study?
      The location of the study is a binding factor that explains obedience.
    • Why did the location of the study at Yale University matter?
      Yale University conferred status and prestige on the proceedings.
    • What was the effect on obedience when the study was conducted in a run-down building?
      Obedience dropped to 47.5% in the run-down building.
    • What conclusion did Milgram draw about location and obedience?
      Milgram concluded that location affects obedience, with lower-status locations resulting in lower obedience.
    • What are the strengths of Milgram's situational variables research?
      • Bickman's study supports the idea that situational variables affect obedience.
      • High ecological validity due to naive participants.
      • Standardized procedures enhance reliability.
    • What are the limitations of Milgram's situational variables research?
      • Some variations were difficult to fake, impacting validity.
      • Participant suspicion could affect findings.
      • Conclusions could be misused to excuse harmful behavior.