Save
...
Social Influence
Obedience
Milgram's Situational Variables Affecting Obedience
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
malvina gofmane
Visit profile
Cards (20)
What does proximity refer to in the context of Milgram's study?
Proximity refers to how
close
to or
far
away
someone or something is.
View source
How does proximity affect destructive obedience according to Milgram?
Destructive obedience is more
easily
achieved
if the person being
harmed
is
out of sight.
View source
What was Milgram's hypothesis regarding obedience and proximity?
Milgram hypothesized that obedience
decreases
as
proximity
increases.
View source
What was the effect on obedience when the Teacher and Learner were in the same room?
Obedience dropped from
65%
to
40%
when they were in the same room.
View source
What happened when the Teacher had to force the Learner's hand onto the shock plate?
Obedience dropped to
30%
in this variation.
View source
What was the outcome when the experimenter issued instructions by phone?
Obedience dropped to
20.5%
when instructions were given by
phone.
View source
What conclusion did Milgram draw about proximity and destructive obedience?
Milgram concluded that proximity is a
key
variable
in
destructive
obedience.
View source
What does uniform signify in the context of obedience?
Uniform signifies
authority
and
increases
the
likelihood
of
obedience.
View source
What did Bickman's research in 1974 demonstrate about uniforms?
Bickman's research showed that people were
more likely
to obey a confederate dressed as a
security guard
than in plain clothes.
View source
How is obedience culturally transmitted according to the study material?
Obedience
is taught both directly and indirectly through
cultural
and
societal
norms.
View source
What role does social hierarchy play in obedience?
Most cultures operate a
social
hierarchy
where
authority
figures
are expected to be
obeyed.
View source
What was the uniform worn by the experimenter in Milgram's original study?
The experimenter wore a
grey lab coat
.
View source
What happened when the original experimenter was replaced by a man in plain clothes?
Only
20%
of
participants
went up to
450 volts
in this variation.
View source
What conclusion did Milgram reach regarding uniforms and obedience?
Milgram concluded that a uniform confers
authority
and results in
higher
levels of
obedience.
View source
What is one factor that explains obedience in Milgram's original study?
The
location
of the study is a
binding
factor
that explains
obedience.
View source
Why did the location of the study at Yale University matter?
Yale University conferred
status
and
prestige
on the proceedings.
View source
What was the effect on obedience when the study was conducted in a run-down building?
Obedience dropped to
47.5%
in the
run-down building.
View source
What conclusion did Milgram draw about location and obedience?
Milgram concluded that
location
affects
obedience
, with
lower-status
locations
resulting in
lower
obedience.
View source
What are the strengths of Milgram's situational variables research?
Bickman's study supports the idea that situational variables affect obedience.
High
ecological validity
due to
naive participants
.
Standardized procedures
enhance reliability.
View source
What are the limitations of Milgram's situational variables research?
Some variations were
difficult to fake
, impacting validity.
Participant
suspicion
could affect findings.
Conclusions could be
misused
to excuse harmful behavior.
View source