Troeltsch differentiated between churches and sects, highlighting the prime differences between the two
Niebuhr introduced denominations
Churches
they are large, conservative and mainstream religious organisations that seek to maintain the statusquo
they have a bureaucratic and hierarchical structure in which there is a clear line of seniority amongst the clergy, this is seen by their varying salaries
they claim a monopoly of truth and reject alternative interpretations
connected to the state, this is seen in some countries having an “official” or “state” religion. eg. King Charles III is the head of the Church of England
they pose very few, loose demands on their members
Sects
smaller, world-rejecting quasi-religious organisations that have broken away from a mainstream religion through a schism
claim a monopoly of truth
they lack bureaucracy and hierarchy, and instead are led by a charismatic leader
they demand total commitment from members, this comes with the costs of significant sacrifices on the members part
hostile to the state and other mainstream religions, and often comprised of marginalised, deprived groups. eg those of an ethnic-minority, or those on low incomes
Sects tend to grow quickly, but can also decline just as fast with the death of a leader, or the erroneousprophesying of “imminent” events
Niebhur described a denomination as a half-way house between sects and churches, as sects tend to change overtime, becoming more church-like
Denominations
not closely connected to the state, but will comment and campaign on societal issues
they have some bureaucracy and hierarchy, but less than an established church
quite accepting of other religious denominations, churches and religious beliefs
eg. Methodist, Baptists
evaluations of sociological definitions and explanations of organisation?
Bruce argues that with the emergence of religious pluralism, society’s acceptance of diverse religious beliefs and practises in a multi-faith society, Troeltsch’s typology of the church becomes inapplicable to contemporary society
religious pluralism makes it harder for churches to claim monopoly of truth
Bruce highlights that the Church of England often takes critical positions about government policies, and campaigns for change, this shows that it is not always a conservative force
Another evaluation?
Robertson argues that globalisation and the secularisation of society has led to a decline in the state’s concern for the church’s attitudes
Another evaluation?
It is becoming more common in modern Western societies for people in society to not belong to a church. Despite having a population of nearly 66 million, the established church, Church of England, has fewer than a million members
schisms are divisions that occur within a religious groups due to differences in beliefs, practises or leadership
charismatic leaders of sects tend to attract overzealous members of society who have become disillusioned with society, encouraging them to reject mainstream societal values
Cults
the aim and promise is often to help members improve their lives
they are individualised and loosely-organised
do not demand total commitment from its members
they are tolerant and do not claim a monopoly of truth
often confused with sects in popular culture and popularusage
sects have an authoritarian structure
Wallis
looked at how religious organisations view themselves versus how outsiders perceived them
identified 3 types of New Religious Movements, world-rejecting, world-affirming and world-accommodating
3 types of NRM according to willis?
world-rejecting; harbour values that run counter to mainstream societal values, believe that a radical, fundamental change in the way society is organised is crucial, eg. Millenarianism
world-accommodating; class life as having spiritual and worldly spheres, focusing on the spiritual
world-affirming; offer spiritual enrichment to members and strive to unlock “hidden potential”, eg. Scientology
some world-affirming cults are more organised and so demand more from their members, as is the case for Scientology
Stark and Bainbridge look at religious and spiritual movements through a more business-likelens, referring to participants/congregants as clients or customers. they identified the different types of cults to be audience, client or cult movements
Stark & Bainbridge’s 3 types of cults?
audience cults; the “client” is a passiveconsumer, sets of beliefs and values are typically consumed through books, DVDs or lectures
client cults; there is a prolonged relationship between cult and client akin to that of doctor/patient relationship, the cult is a serviceprovider
cult movement; do not provide just one service, but instead seek to fulfil all spiritualneeds of the clients, relationship starts to resemble that of a church or denomination with its congregation
Arguably, Scientology started as an audience cult and developed into a client cult when it sought to offer psychological therapy through indoctrination of Hubbard’s theory (dianetics) and “dianeticauditing”, this form of therapy has been highly controversial and is widely condemned by the scientific community
PostmodernistDrane argues that the rise in New Age Movements can be attributed to the apparent failure of science as a belief system
whilst the Enlightenment has led to the dissmisal of traditional religions, people found that science did not infact answer the ultimate questions of life
Drane argues that people are beginning to turn to themselves and spirituality as a means of finding rationality
sects harbour beliefs and values that are deemed as deviant by society
some sects even go as far as establishing themselves as substitutes for family or other conventional social groupings
sects as short-lived organisations
they tend to lose initial fervour and enthusiasm after the first generation, commitment and beliefs of parents can be hard to socialise into children
Becker states that denominations are “a sect that has cooled down”, as they become more world-accommodating and tolerant to other beliefs of mainstream religions
in a postmodern society, the shelf-life of sects are massively reduced due to changes in consumer tastes and fashions