case study - conscientious objectors

Cards (5)

  • conscription in ww2 and conscientious objectors
    • the military services act of 1916 made it compulsory for all unmarried men aged 18-41 to join the armed services. it did allow exemption for people objecting to join on religious, moral or political grounds. called the conscientious objectors- around 16,000 men applied for this type of exemption.
    • men would have to petition & appear in court known as a tribunal.
    • the conscientious objectors would argue their case , tribunals made up of retired soldiers and local figures
    • accusations of an unfair hearing
  • treatment
    • some conscientious objectors were given work which supported war effort but didnt fight
    • sometimes these jobs were in Britain, but others were given roles on the western front eg ambulance driver
    • the cos who refused to do the other work were ' absolutists' and imprisoned and did hard labour
    • some sent to fight on the western front, if refused, they could be sentenced to death. Most were given a 10 year sentence
    • by the end of war, 73 people died due to the harsh treatment
  • why were they treated so harsh?
    • the casualties rate was so high that the gov needed the public to support conscription or risk losing the war
    • the media spread veiw of COs as a cowardly and unpatriotic.
    • si public opinion on the cos was negative
    • most had family/friends killed in the war so felt the cos were lacking responsibility
    • their harsh punishment were publicised to deter others applying for exemption
  • changes in ww2
    • 60,00 people applied for exemption on the ground of conscientious objection.
    • tribunals no longer included former soliders and a greater effort was made to find cos alternative working on a farm or a munitions factory. it was only those who actively campaigned against the war could be prisoned
    • this was due to the change of attitude- in ww2 people were being asked to unite against Hitler as a tryant
    • as nazism persecuted minorities it would be hypocritical of the gov to punish cos harshly
    • despite gov attitude changing, public opinion didn't. Cos abused verbally and attacked.
  • factors
    a.i.s : harsh veiws of COs from public
    church- religion was the main reason people applied for exemption from fighting
    gov- change in policy between ww1-2- more understanding shown in ww2 and more lenience with alternative work