ZIMBARDO

Cards (7)

  • Aim: If ordinary people were placed in a simulated prison environment and some of them were designed as guards and some prisoners, how would they behave in their social roles?
  • Procedure: 24 emotionally and psychologically stable male students
    randomly assigned to prisoner or guard - all pts desired to be a prisoner initially
    dehumanised by police
    guards wear uniforms, sunglasses etc
    physical punishment wasn't permitted
    prisoners had to follow 16 rules enforced by guards
  • Findings:
    guards and prisoners settled quickly into social roles
    after a prisoner 'rebellion' guards became more sadistic
    some prisoners sided with guards against prisoners
    after 36 hours 1 prisoner was released due top fits of crying and rage
    3 more prisoners developed similar symptoms
    stopped after 6 days due to increased violence
    both groups were surprised in post interviews at the uncharacteristic behaviour they'd shown
  • Conclusion:
    individuals conform readily to our social roles demanded of a situation - even when the demands override our own moral beliefs
    social roles demonstrated were obtained from media sources and learned sources of power
  • Evaluation: high internal validity and control
    lab experiment and selection of participants
    screened emotionally stable individuals and randomly assigned them - ruled out individual differences
    in these roles by chance if behaved differently - pressure of the situation
    IV increased - credibility rises
  • Evaluation: real world application
    time of the Iraq war (2003-2004)
    US personnel committed crimes against prisoners at a prison
    12 soldiers were removed from duty, 11 charged and others sent to prison
    Zimbardo was an expert witness at the trials due to his experiment
    said there were similarities.
  • What is a strength of Zimbardo's research?
    High levels of mundane realism -
    • 90% of the prisoners' private conversations  revolved around prison life
    • The guards talked about ‘problem prisoners,’ or other prison topics on their breaks; they never discussed home life or other topics.