++ slidingscale of punishment so more serious offences have worse punishment
++ oapa around for over 150 years, established case law that works alongside to give additional clarification/definition the statute doesn't provide
++ new case law can set precedent if needed, system works
-- same as assault/battery
-- out of date, when act drafted said bodily harm what about mental harm
-- not logical sentencing structure reflecting seriousness of each offence, little difference between battery and abh (abh 5years, battery 6months)
-- same mens rea as assault and battery, harsher sentence
-- same max sentence as s20 (5 years) although less harm
-- doesn't conform to correspondence principle, can be guilty of s47 without intending injury
reform - keep max sentence at 5 years
reform - 1998 draft bill in home office consultation document, set out 4 main offences, clause 3 created offence of intentional or reckless injury to replace s47, not passed into act
reform - law commission 2015 proposals support this, d guilty if intentionally/recklessly cause injury to another