modern positivists

Cards (11)

  • what did 20th century positivists argue sociologists should be?

    value free
  • why did they want to be value free?

    -wanted to appear scientific
    -science is concerned with matters of fact, not value
  • by the 20th century many sociologists were what?
    'hiring hands'
    -helped organisations solve their problems
    -own values were irrelevant
  • AO3 : Gouldner
    -criticises sociologists own values being irrelevant
    -'spiritless technicians'
  • Weber's response to Gouldner
    -they're just doing their job
  • why might it be difficult to remain value-free?

    funding careers :
    > most research is funded by government
    > whoever pays for research may control its direction and the questions asked
  • why might it be difficult to main value free?
    values, perspectives & methods :
    > for Gouldner all research is inevitably influenced by values
    > choice of topic, concepts, methods, conclusions
  • value freedom vs value commitment
    Myrdal & Gouldner
    -argue it's not only impossible, but also undesirable to be value-free in research
    -sociologists should be value committed > openly 'taking sides' by embracing values & interests of groups
    -being value free, sociologists are 'researchers-for-rent' selling their services
  • value freedom vs value commitment
    Becker : 'Whose Side Are We On Anyway?'

    -agrees with Gouldner that all sociology is influenced by values
    -positivist sociology often takes viewpoint of the powerful
    -so whose side are we on?
    -need to look at the underdogs and other powerless groups to reveal new dimension to social reality
  • example of positivist sociology taking viewpoint of the powerful

    -official statistics > come from powerful groups
    > crime : comes from police, courts
    > mental illness : comes from hospitals, doctors, prisons
    -powerful groups able to define crime, mental illness etc.
    -able to attach labels to someone in society
  • Whose Side Are We On Anyway? - AO3 : Gouldner
    -argues it's not enough to describe the underdog's life
    -we must be committed to ending their oppression