Cultural variations in attachment

    Cards (35)

    • What percentage of securely attached children was found in the USA according to the study?
      65%
    • How many studies were conducted in the UK regarding attachment types?
      1 study
    • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Holland?
      67%
    • What percentage of securely attached children was reported in Germany?
      57%
    • How many studies were included in the meta-analysis conducted by Van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg?
      32 studies
    • What was the main finding of Simonella et al regarding securely attached children in Italy?
      The proportion of securely attached children was only 50%
    • What did researchers suggest was the reason for the lower proportion of securely attached children in Italy?
      Changing cultural and social expectations of mothers
    • What did Jin et al (2012) find regarding insecurely attached Korean infants?
      The majority were classed as insecure resistant
    • How does the attachment pattern in Korean infants compare to that in Japan according to Jin et al's findings?
      Both show a higher prevalence of insecure resistant attachment
    • What is a potential limitation of the study conducted by Van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg?
      It may lack ecological validity due to cultural variations within countries
    • What did Sagi and van Izjendoorn find regarding attachment patterns in rural versus urban areas?
      Rural areas had an overrepresentation of insecure-resistant individuals
    • What criticism is leveled against the Strange Situation regarding its cultural applicability?
      It is culture-bound and biased towards American children
    • What is an example of imposed etic in the context of the Strange Situation?
      Ainsworth assumed attachment stages could be universally applied
    • Why can the findings of van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg be considered reliable?
      They used significantly large samples, totaling 1990 children
    • How does the large sample size in van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg's study affect the validity of their conclusions?
      It increases validity by reducing the likelihood of chance results
    • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Japan?
      68%
    • What percentage of securely attached children was found in China?
      50%
    • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Israel?
      64%
    • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Sweden?
      74%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in the USA?
      21%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in the USA?
      14%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in the UK?
      22%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in the UK?
      3%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Holland?
      26%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Holland?
      7%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Germany?
      35%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Germany?
      8%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Japan?
      5%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Japan?
      27%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in China?
      25%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in China?
      25%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Israel?
      7%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Israel?
      29%
    • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Sweden?
      22%
    • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Sweden?
      4%