Cultural variations in attachment

Cards (35)

  • What percentage of securely attached children was found in the USA according to the study?
    65%
  • How many studies were conducted in the UK regarding attachment types?
    1 study
  • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Holland?
    67%
  • What percentage of securely attached children was reported in Germany?
    57%
  • How many studies were included in the meta-analysis conducted by Van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg?
    32 studies
  • What was the main finding of Simonella et al regarding securely attached children in Italy?
    The proportion of securely attached children was only 50%
  • What did researchers suggest was the reason for the lower proportion of securely attached children in Italy?
    Changing cultural and social expectations of mothers
  • What did Jin et al (2012) find regarding insecurely attached Korean infants?
    The majority were classed as insecure resistant
  • How does the attachment pattern in Korean infants compare to that in Japan according to Jin et al's findings?
    Both show a higher prevalence of insecure resistant attachment
  • What is a potential limitation of the study conducted by Van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg?
    It may lack ecological validity due to cultural variations within countries
  • What did Sagi and van Izjendoorn find regarding attachment patterns in rural versus urban areas?
    Rural areas had an overrepresentation of insecure-resistant individuals
  • What criticism is leveled against the Strange Situation regarding its cultural applicability?
    It is culture-bound and biased towards American children
  • What is an example of imposed etic in the context of the Strange Situation?
    Ainsworth assumed attachment stages could be universally applied
  • Why can the findings of van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg be considered reliable?
    They used significantly large samples, totaling 1990 children
  • How does the large sample size in van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg's study affect the validity of their conclusions?
    It increases validity by reducing the likelihood of chance results
  • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Japan?
    68%
  • What percentage of securely attached children was found in China?
    50%
  • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Israel?
    64%
  • What percentage of securely attached children was found in Sweden?
    74%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in the USA?
    21%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in the USA?
    14%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in the UK?
    22%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in the UK?
    3%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Holland?
    26%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Holland?
    7%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Germany?
    35%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Germany?
    8%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Japan?
    5%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Japan?
    27%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in China?
    25%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in China?
    25%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Israel?
    7%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Israel?
    29%
  • What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Sweden?
    22%
  • What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Sweden?
    4%