Save
Psychology paper 1
Cultural variations in attachment
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Rhian
Visit profile
Cards (35)
What percentage of securely attached children was found in the USA according to the study?
65%
View source
How many studies were conducted in the UK regarding attachment types?
1 study
View source
What percentage of securely attached children was found in
Holland?
67%
View source
What
percentage
of
securely attached children was reported in
Germany?
57%
View source
How many studies were included in the meta-analysis conducted by Van Izjendoorn and
Kronenberg?
32 studies
View source
What was the main finding of Simonella et al regarding securely attached children in Italy?
The proportion of securely attached children was only 50%
View source
What did researchers suggest was the reason for the lower proportion of securely attached children in Italy?
Changing cultural and social expectations of mothers
View source
What did Jin et al (2012) find regarding insecurely attached Korean infants?
The majority were classed as insecure resistant
View source
How does the attachment pattern in Korean infants compare to that in Japan according to Jin et al's findings?
Both show a higher prevalence of insecure resistant attachment
View source
What is a potential limitation of the study conducted by Van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg?
It may lack ecological validity due to cultural variations within countries
View source
What did Sagi and van Izjendoorn find regarding attachment patterns in rural versus urban areas?
Rural areas had an overrepresentation of insecure-resistant individuals
View source
What criticism is leveled against the Strange Situation regarding its cultural applicability?
It is culture-bound and
biased
towards American children
View source
What is an example of imposed etic in the context of the Strange Situation?
Ainsworth
assumed attachment stages could be universally applied
View source
Why can the findings of van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg be considered reliable?
They used
significantly
large samples, totaling
1990
children
View source
How does the large sample size in van Izjendoorn and Kronenberg's study affect the validity of their conclusions?
It increases validity by reducing the likelihood of
chance results
View source
What percentage of securely attached children was found in Japan?
68%
View source
What percentage of securely attached children was found in China?
50%
View source
What percentage of securely attached children was found in Israel?
64%
View source
What percentage of securely attached children was found in Sweden?
74%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in the USA?
21%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in the USA?
14%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in the UK?
22%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in the UK?
3%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Holland?
26%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Holland?
7%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Germany?
35%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Germany?
8%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Japan?
5%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Japan?
27%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in China?
25%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in China?
25%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Israel?
7%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Israel?
29%
View source
What percentage of avoidant attachment was found in Sweden?
22%
View source
What percentage of resistant attachment was found in Sweden?
4%
View source