Save
...
Philosophy
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE
Logical Positivists and the Verification Principle
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Cerys 🪩
Visit profile
Cards (10)
Who were the Vienna circle / logical positivists?
Group of philosophers working in
Vienna
in the 1920s who discussed how we use language. They said statements can only be meaningful if they can be
verified
View source
What does the verification principle state?
We know the meaning of a
statement
if we know the
conditions
under which the statement is
true
or
false
View source
When is a statement proven meaningless?
If it cannot be proven through
reasoning
or practical
evidence
View source
Example of verification principle
The statement
God
is good is
meaningless
because you have to prove God exists and his
nature
for the statement to be true or false, which we cannot do
View source
What was pointless to talk about according to the logical positiivists?
Ethics
,
God
and
art.
They don't apply to the principle because they're too
'opinion-based
View source
What is a weakness of the verification principle?
Language such as
'all'
cannot be tested because it is too
general
View source
Why is religious language meaningless to the logical positivists?
It extends past human
experience
and
understanding
View source
What is AJ Ayer's strong and weak verification principle?
Strong
- true by definition
Weak
- if there is no way of verifying something in the moment, for example a
historical
event
View source
Does Ayer regard religious language as meaningful or meaningless?
Meaningless
View source
What is the weakness of the original verification principle that Ayer attempted to address?
Statements that are not
verifiable
in practice but could be verifiable should be
meaningful
View source