Outline how improvingappearance influences jury decision
W - Improveappearance
H -
Get the wit / def to dress smartly
Get wit / def to speak standardEnglish
Take out piercings and cover tattoos
Encourage good posture - confidence
Y - Dion found the Halo effect using 60 psych students and found notion of "What is beautiful is good", meaning if the wit / def presents themselves well, the jury is less likely to give defendant guilty verdict / more likely to believe witness
Outline Story Order Model - Pennington + Hastie
W - StoryOrder Model
H -
Counsel for prosecution & defence presents evi in chronological order
Lawyers create timeline organising this
Enables jurors to use narrative to enhance memory of events
Jurors make own story based on evi at trial - may have few stories as heard different versions from pros + def
Judge sums up evi & advise jury to come to verdict
Juror matches story to verdict + judge provides alternative verdictdecisions & jurors match account they constructed to decision
What is the usefulness and effectiveness of the Story Order Model by Pennington + Hastie?
Usefulness:
Provides lawyers with strategy to influence decision making of jurors to benefit client
Useful for jurors to create account and understand evidence
Effectiveness:
Shown story order more effective than witness order
Outline how expert witnesses influence jury
W - Expertwitness
H -
Used where scientific, technical or specialised area needs explaining in court and provide independent, impartial & unbiased evi to assist court decision
Have analytical reasoning & communicate findings + opinionsclearly
Y - Cutler:
Experiments investigating influence expert psychological testimony on juror decision
Experienced jurors + mock jurors
Videotaped trial & rated creditability of eyewit. & strength of cases to give verdict
Expert psychological testimony improved juror sensitivity to eyewitevi
Outline how CSI effect influences jury
W - CSI effect
H / Y -
TVshow impacts way jury perceives evi
Show portrays forensic science as "hightechmagic" + claim this produced unrealistic expectations of evi & to expect too much of prosecution so defence harder to convince
Strong when comes to DNA but research proven juror often doesn't understand what this evidence is so more likely to be regarded as infallible