Save
Psychology
Social Casestudies
Bocchiaro
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Jiya Mathew
Visit profile
Cards (23)
What was the aim of Bocchiaro's 2012 study?
To investigate
obedience
, disobedience, and
whistle-blowing
in ethically wrong situations.
View source
Why was it important to investigate the accuracy of people's estimates in Bocchiaro's study?
To understand how well individuals perceive their own and others' behaviors regarding
obedience
.
View source
What role did dispositional factors play in Bocchiaro's study?
They were investigated to see how they influenced
obedience
, disobedience, and
whistle-blowing
.
View source
How many undergraduate students participated in the main study of Bocchiaro's research?
149
undergraduate students.
View source
What method was used to recruit participants for Bocchiaro's study?
Participants were recruited via flyers placed around the
cafeteria
.
View source
What compensation did participants receive for taking part in the study?
Participants were either paid
7 Euros
or given course credit.
View source
How many participants were removed from the initial sample of Bocchiaro's study?
11
participants were removed.
View source
What are pilot studies and why were they conducted in Bocchiaro's research?
Pilot studies are preliminary tests to assess
methodology
.
8
pilot studies were conducted to ensure moral acceptability and credibility.
Post-pilot interviews confirmed participants believed the cover story.
View source
What ethical considerations were taken into account in Bocchiaro's study?
Participants
were informed of the task, risks, and their right to
withdraw
at any time.
View source
What was the first task participants were asked to do in Room 1 of the procedure?
Participants were asked to provide names of other
students
.
View source
What was the cover story given to participants in Bocchiaro's study?
Participants were asked to write a supporting statement for research about
sensory deprivation
.
View source
What did participants do in Room 2 of the procedure?
Participants completed the
supporting statement
and could report anonymously.
View source
What personality inventories were used in Bocchiaro's study?
HEXACO-PI-R
and Social Value Orientation (
SVO
).
View source
What does the HEXACO-PI-R measure?
It measures six major dimensions of personality including
honesty-humility
and
emotionality
.
View source
How were participants rated in the Social Value Orientation (SVO) inventory?
Participants were classified as
pro-social
,
individualistic
, or
competitive
based on their preferences.
View source
What happened after participants completed the inventories?
Participants were
probed
for suspicion and then
debriefed
.
View source
How long did the experiment last for each participant?
Approximately
40
minutes.
View source
What were the individual and actual results regarding obedience, disobedience, and whistle-blowing?
Individual results:
Obedient
:
3.6%
Disobedient
:
31.9%
Whistle blow
:
64.5%
Actual results:
Obedient:
76.5%
Disobedient:
14.1%
Whistle blow:
9.4%
View source
What did participants tend to do when obedient versus disobedient in terms of responsibility?
Participants
externalized
responsibility when obedient but not when disobedient.
View source
What are the main conclusions drawn from Bocchiaro's study?
People are poor judges of their own and others' behavior regarding obedience.
Non-violent immoral acts can be committed by
ordinary
individuals
in response to authority.
Whistleblowing is a less common but valid response to authority.
Individual
moral responsibility
may mediate these effects.
View source
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Bocchiaro's research design?
Strengths:
Strict control over
extraneous variables
.
Clear
cause and effect
relationship established.
Weaknesses:
Ethical issues may cause distress to participants.
Findings may be culture-bound due to
participant demographics
.
View source
Why is it important to conduct a cost-benefit analysis in research like Bocchiaro's?
To assess whether the
ethical costs
are balanced against the benefits of improved knowledge.
View source
How did the pilot studies contribute to the validity of Bocchiaro's research?
They ensured
standardization
of
experimenter-authority
behavior and tested materials and
procedures
.
View source