Lecture 4 - Criminal Justice Process

Cards (70)

  • Who is the lecturer for the LAW4007 Criminal Legal Process module?
    Luke Fisher
  • What are the main topics covered in the LAW4007 Criminal Legal Process module?
    • Two opposing systems of Criminal Justice
    • Accountability and Human Rights
    • CPR and CPS
    • Classification of Offences and allocation
    • Pre-Trial and Trial – Procedure and some Evidential Considerations
    • Criticism
  • Who constructed the two models of criminal justice?
    Herbert Packer
  • What are the two models of criminal justice proposed by Herbert Packer?
    The Crime Control model and the Due Process model
  • What accounts for the conflict and disharmony in the criminal justice system according to Packer's models?
    The tension between the Crime Control model and the Due Process model
  • What is the primary function of criminal justice according to the Due Process model?
    To provide due process or fundamental fairness under the law
  • According to the Due Process model, what should criminal justice concentrate on?
    Defendants' rights
  • How should police powers be viewed under the Due Process model?
    They should be limited to prevent official oppression of the individual
  • What is the view on constitutional rights in the Due Process model?
    They are not mere technicalities and authorities should be held accountable
  • How does the Due Process model view the criminal justice process?
    As an obstacle course with procedural safeguards
  • What is the stance of the Due Process model on government actions regarding guilt?
    The government should not hold a person guilty without following legal procedures
  • What is the primary function of criminal justice according to the Crime Control model?
    The repression of crime
  • What does the Crime Control model prioritize over defendants' rights?
    Vindicating victims' rights
  • How should police powers be viewed under the Crime Control model?
    They should be expanded to facilitate investigations
  • What is the view on legal technicalities in the Crime Control model?
    They should be eliminated to aid police work
  • How does the Crime Control model view the criminal justice process?
    As an assembly-line conveyor belt
  • What is the presumption of guilt in the Crime Control model based on?
    The reliability of police and prosecutor fact-finding
  • What is the main objective of the criminal justice process in the Crime Control model?
    To discover the truth or establish factual guilt
  • How do the Crime Control and Due Process models reflect different values?
    • Crime Control model: Reflects conservative values
    • Due Process model: Reflects liberal values
    • Political climate influences which model shapes criminal justice policy
  • What was the political climate during the 1960s regarding criminal justice policy?
    It was politically liberal, favoring due process principles
  • What political philosophy dominated from the mid-1970s to the early 21st century?
    Conservatism
  • What is the significance of changing attitudes towards drug crime?
    It may indicate a shift back to more liberal values
  • What role does the Police and Crime Commissioner play?
    To oversee an efficient police force and hold the Chief Constable accountable
  • What are the key articles of the Human Rights Act 1998 relevant to criminal justice?
    • Art 2: Right to Life
    • Art 3: Prohibiting Torture
    • Art 5: Right to liberty
    • Art 6: Right to a Fair Trial
    • Art 8: Right to a private and family life
  • What was the outcome of the case Chief Constable Herts v Van Colle [2008]?
    The House of Lords confirmed a positive obligation under Art 2 to protect individuals whose lives are threatened
  • What was the court's finding regarding the police's knowledge of risk to Van Colle's life?
    There was no valid basis to conclude that the police should have known of a real and immediate risk
  • What were the circumstances of the case Michael and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015]?
    Ms. Michael requested police protection from her aggressive ex-boyfriend, who later killed her
  • What was the outcome of the call made by Ms. Michael to the police?
    The call was downgraded, and police arrived too late to prevent her murder
  • What was the claim made by Michael's family against the police services?
    They claimed damages for negligence and under the Human Rights Act, Art 2
  • What was the Divisional Court's decision regarding the police's application for summary judgment in the Michael case?
    It refused the police application for summary judgment
  • What did the Supreme Court uphold in the Michael case?
    No claim in negligence, but a possible Art 2 claim
  • What did Lord Kerr state regarding police duty in the Michael case?
    There is a legal duty for police to protect individuals whose lives are threatened
  • What is the overriding objective of the Criminal Procedure Rules?
    • To deal with criminal cases justly
    • Acquitting the innocent and convicting the guilty
    • Recognizing defendants' rights under Article 6
    • Respecting the interests of witnesses and victims
    • Ensuring efficient case management
  • What does Rule 3 of the Criminal Procedure Rules emphasize?
    The judge's active case management role
  • What does the early identification of issues in case management aim to achieve?
    Certainty about what must be done and by whom
  • What was the finding of the research by Darbyshire (2014) regarding case management rules?
    These rules are applied differently in different courts
  • What was the situation regarding police prosecution prior to 1986?
    Police prosecuted most crimes themselves
  • What did the 1970 report "The Prosecution in England and Wales" argue?
    It was not in the interests of justice to have the same agency investigating and prosecuting crimes
  • What were the concerns regarding police prosecution before 1986?
    Prosecution was not impartial and could withhold disclosure
  • What was the outcome of the Royal Commission in Criminal Procedure 1981?
    It highlighted inconsistent decisions and inadequate case preparation