Religion may continue development within society, in India it has legitimised middle class prosperity and ultra-nationalism and Pentecostalism has achieved global success by incorporating local beliefs
Religion can be a form of cultural defence to resist changes in society
Modernisation may be leading to secularisation as religious diversity might cause a decline in religious practises and participation
Globalisation may have causes religious fundamentalism as they believe in literal scripture interpretation and cause conflict with other fundamentalism groups
Religion can be tied to Economic growth
Globalisation brought rapid economic growth for India, especially bringing prosperity for India's new middle class
Nanda found 85% of India's population is Hindu, despite the prosperity of the middle class, the first group to typically abandon religion, a vast majority still believe in the supernatural
A survey by the Centre of the Study of Developing Societies found 30% of Indians they spoke to say they are becoming more religious, Nanda says this is fashionable for them
Middle classIndians say they are attracted to what were once low status village Gods because these entities are more responsive to peoples needs
Nandafound the reason the Indianmiddle class is so religious is because of their uncertainty about their new found wealth
Modern versions of Hinduism continue to legitimise middle class consumerism and say it can be 'spiritually balanced'
Pentecostalism has expanded into Latin America
Lehmann says the success of Pentecostalism is because they can incorporate local beliefs , and claim a great access to the Holy Spirit
Berger said Pentecostalism in Latin America was a functional equivalent to Weber'sprotestant worth ethic. It encourages development of capitalism
However Berger admits, religion is not the only reason for economic development, in Northern Brazil despite Pentecostalism, there is not enough natural recourses to raise them out of poverty
Bruce says religion acts as a unifier for a community against an external threat, such as Poland or Iran
In Soviet Poland the Catholic Church was suppressed, and it served as popular rallying point to appose the Soviet Union
In Iran, the Shah of Iran was a pro-western regime leader. Under his rule, Islam quickly grew in opposition of rapid change
Eventually in Iran, people began fighting back with the creation of the Islamic Republic, which imposed Sharia law
However, the Iranianrevolution was not typical of the middle east as religious leaders led it
Bruce said secularisation of America was increasing because of; declining church attendance, 'secularisation from within' and a trend towards religious diveristy
Opinion Polls in the US suggests church attendance was at 40% since the 1940s and would stay stagnant
Hadaway said these statistic of 40% of Americans going to Church didn't match the Churches own attendance, because if that was the case all Churches would be full
Hadaway found Ohio residents said 83% went to church but when counting the number at Church it was significantly lower
Bruce says religion has become psychologised and turned into a form of therapy, enabling it to fit secular society and American religion would remain popular by being less religious
Hunter found a large percent of America evangelists found smoking/drinking as morally wrong (1951) while those interviewed later on did not (1982)
Bruce says there is a rise of 'practical relativism' in American Christianity saying other are entitled to their own beliefs
'Practical relativism' is the counterpart to 'erosion of absolutism' meaning people all have different beliefs in a society that undermine our own religion
Fundamentalismviews often will conflict with the views of a liberal society
Fundamentalisms believe in the absolute, and literal truth of scripture
'Us vs Them mentality'
Fundamentalists will separate themselves from the rest of the world
'Aggressive reactions'
Fundamentalists will shock and intimidate to bring attention to their beliefs
'Reject modern technology'
Oppose modern culture and its liberalism but will use technology to achieve their aims
'Patriarchy'
Fundamentalists will favour control over women's sexuality and power
'Prophecy'
Believe the end days will be soon upon us
'Conspiracy theories'
Believe in powerful, evil forces in control of human destiny
Taylor says across all religions Fundamentalists tend to act similarly;
Group perceived challenge to ultimate authority
Decide challenge will not be tolerated
Reaffirm their belief in authority being challenged
Oppose those who have challenged them, often using political means to further their cause
Examples of religious Fundamentalists include the New Christian Right and ISIS
New Christian Right believe that they will take America back to God
ISIS believe in a single religious political leader and Sharia Law