government funded schemes to help those people who can't afford to get legal advice or legal representation.
there are 3 main difficulties
a person fails to see that their problem has legal implications
when a person fails to pursue the case because of implications like cost, or sees solicitors as unapproachable
when a person doesn't know of the existences of a legal service or cannot find the one who could help.
Legal Aid agency
made in LASPO 2012
government agency set up to administer the civil and criminal legal aid in England and Wales
various services were made available such as Legal help (where advice can be given) and legal representation (which gives full legal services)
legal aid agency role
ensure that legal aid services provided by barristers, solicitors and the not-for-profit sector are available to the general public
fund the civil legal advice service
run the public defender service to give a range of services within the criminal defence market
government funding for civil cases
Civil Legal Advice is a national telephone service and website that provides legal advice on civil matters. can get advice on debt, education, discrimination, housing, family issues.
to qualify for funding, claimant needs to pass both means and merits test
means test
look at both the claimants income and capital, will also look at their partner's finances unless they have a contrary interest.
meritstest
looks at the reason for taking the action, and the chance of success.
certain limited types of claims are able to be funded by civil legal aid
repossession of a property
asylum and immigration cases
medical negligence cases
mental health and child welfare cases
protection from violence or harassment
government funding for criminal cases
under the jurisdiction of the Legal Aid Agency
agency makes contracts with law firms to provide legal services to people charged with criminal offences
under s13 of the LASPO 2012, legal aid for advice is provided for a suspect detained in police custody and who has requested legal advice.
criminal cases advice and assistance for individuals held in custody
not means tested
advice is provided by duty solicitors
duty solicitor decides whether a suspect qualifies for the scheme and for either fact-to-face advice
solicitors can only claim for attending at the police station if they can show that attendance was expected to 'materially progress the case'
criminal cases advice and assistance for criminal proceedings following charge
defendants need to pass a means and merits test in order to receive legal aid for advice and assistance from a solicitor or barrister.
means testing criminal courts
in magistrates court only those on very low incomes who receive legal aid.
about 3/4 of adults do not qualify for legal aid in criminal cases in the magistrates.
in crown court a defendant who has an annual household disposable income of £37,500 or more will not be eligible for legal aid.
if their disposable income is above £3,398 but less than £37,500 they'll have to make a contribution towards their costs.
if defendant receives state benefits, they will automatically pass this test.
merits testing criminal courts
considers the merits of the case and whether legal aid should be granted (any previous convictions, nature of offence, risk of custody)
the more serious the charge, or possible consequences, more likely the defendant will qualify for legal aid.
merits testing criminal courts
takes into account the Widgery criteria which apply to the case e.g.
it's likely I'll loose my liberty
it's likely I'll loose my livelihood
it's likely I'll suffer serious damage to my reputation
I may not be able to understand the court proceedings or present my own case
I may need witnesses to be traced or interviewed on my behalf
it's in the interests of another person that I'm represented.
problems of litigants in person
misunderstanding of the law and procedure
bias: when courts make decisions against litigants in person it's easy for litigant to form views that judge is biased against them
failure to provide the court with appropriate documentation as they don't always know what documents are relevant or required
inappropriate communication with the court: parties are guilty of bombarding courts with emails
refusal to accept decisions of the court: without advice from lawyers litigants will keep appealing.
private funding
own resources - consulting a solicitor or a barrister
insurance - 'before the event insurance' and 'after the event insurance'
conditionalfeeagreements - 'no win, no fee'
own resources
consulting a solicitor or a barrister can be very expensive
lawyers tend to charge from £150 to £650 an hour and some large corporate firms charge £1,000 an hour
insurance
'before the event insurance' - these are taken out where there is no known claim at the time of purchase
'after the event insurance' - (expensive) someone who is taking a case to court will often insure againstlosing the case. this type of insurance is often used with CFA's
conditionalfeeagreements - 'no win, no fee'
can only be used for civil claims
in civil cases the 'loser'pays the other sides legal costs.
solicitor and claimant agree on legal fees, agreement will set out a success fee
success fee - what solicitor will get if case is won, can be 100% of normal fee but is often capped at 25% so claimant doesn't lose all compensation in legal fees. if case is lost then claimant pays nothing.
term of the CFA that client takes out an 'after the event' insurance policy, to cover costs of other party in case the case is lost
strengths of CFA
have helped thousands of people to bring cases to court and obtain justice
number of personalinjury cases have mushroomed and there's been no drain on the LegalAid Bill
legal aid has never been available for defamation but lawyers have been keen to take on CFA's, allowing ordinary people to bring such cases against individuals and even the press
weaknesses of CFA's
low value cases are not attractive to lawyers
success fee can no longer be claimed from losing side
cost of 'after the event' insurance can no longer be claimed back either
a proportion of claimant's compensation will often go to paying lawyer's success fees.
other advice agencies
citizensadvice bureau
law centres
probono unit - advocate
freerepresentation unit
tradeunions
charities
citizens advice bureau
charitable organisation, staffed by full-time employees and trained volunteers who give general advice across a wide range of issues by face to face, telephone, email, webchat.
main areas of advice are for debt, consumer issues, claiming welfare benefits, housing problems, employment matters
often have arrangements with local solicitors who offer clinics to give purely legal advice
solicitors are likely to offer a cheap/free first advice session
law centres
offer free, non-means tested advice to people living in their area and representation in areas where there are no or few solicitors
funded by central or local government but found it difficult to gain enough funding
most law centres have a qualified solicitor working full-time supported by volunteers
pro bono unit
volunteer barristers, give free legal advice on a range of legal issues to members of the public who cannot afford legalfees. the unit may also represent a member of the public in any civil legal proceedings.
free representation unit
provides advice and legal representation in social security and employment tribunals.
they help members of public who aren't eligible for legal aid and cannot afford lawyers.
all FRU representatives are trained and supervised by legal officers.
trade unions
offer members free legal advice on a range of employment related matters and other matters like personalinjury in an accident outside work
members of a union generally pay a subscription which will cover the giving of advice.
often employs full-time specialist advisers.
charities
offer some form of free specialist advice in their area of work
employs either trained advisers or volunteers to provide initial advice and assistance to those who contact them
advantages of civil cases
multiple ways for claimants to obtain legal advice and assistance.
claimants don't rely on just solicitors for advice
many sources of free advice and assistance are specialists in their fields and have knowledge and skills in their areas of expertise.
it's possible to obtain legal advice and representation in a number of fields
for those who can't afford = state funded legalaid.
CFA's are main source of funding for those claiming on personalinjury's
using private funding = choice of experienced lawyers
disadvantages of civil cases
lawyers can't estimate fees upfront, loosing case = pay both lawyer and winner costs = priv funding too costly
lawyers only take cases they think they'll win. claimants may need 'after event' insurance, comp is reduced by success fees.
civil legal aid funding dropped from £1B to £600M then rose to £739M
reduced funding = more litigants in person = delays in system
cuts in funding + high legal costs = increase demand for free advice agencies, leading delays in accessing help.
advantages of criminal cases
suspect in police detention can obtain legal help which prevents police breaking rules.
when a person has been detained, all possessions are taken so availability of free advice is essential.
person facing criminal charges that could seriously affect their future should be able to instruct a lawyer to investigate those charges and obtain evidence.
disadvantages of criminal cases
gov cut legal aid budget for CLA £1.2B to £879M
no drop in offences committed or court cases so money available is reducing.
fewer firms are providing criminal legalaid services as it's not cost effective.
areas of UK don't have access to legal advice and local people have to travel further for help.
caused rise in defendants representing themselves
criminal law is less attractive due to lower pay and unsociable hours.
state run public defender system for all criminal cases is unlikely = too expensive