Save
✅
Ethics
Conscience
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Sophie Kennedy
Visit profile
Cards (34)
Conscience
moral compass
Aquinas
Theological approach
influenced by St. Paul & Augustine
ratio, describes reason
conscientia, reason makes moral judgments
conscience helps us to become better people
Aquinas
conscience is the process of reason
our ability to reason is given to us by God as a result of
imago dei
virtue of
prudence
, the ability to make judgments based on the circumstances we find ourselves in
Aquinas
innate
unconscious habit
God - given but not his direct voice
Aquinas
-
reason
proper moral thinking is a
rational
process
innate, inbuilt capacity as a moral reasoner recognises that certain basic moral
principles
are true/false
Aquinas - Synderesis
the foundation, but conscience is the next step
‘to do good and avoid evil’
Aquinas—
Conscientia
Butler sees
conscience
as a moral sense which allows us to see morality
it is always wrong to go against our conscience or
conscientious
conclusions
Aquinas
- Ignorance
vincible
- pure ignorance, a lack of knowledge for which a person is responsible and can be blamed, no excuse
invincible
- accidental ignorance, a lack of knowledge which someone is not responsible and can’t be blamed
Freud
-
3
parts
Id
, seeks pleasure
ego
, mediator
super-ego
, internalised moral standards
Aquinas - pros/cons
pros
simple
rational
to prioritise good
reason used
cons
illogical
to apply reason always
outdated
views
lacks modern psychology
Freud - pros/
cons
pros
umbrella term
, inclusive
scientific
focuses on guilt
cons
complex, 3 parts
ideas cannot be falsified
not enough evidence from
case studies
Freud
- Horse&Rider Analogy
the
ego
(rider) guides the id (horse).
Freud
conscience
is the influence of
parents
Guilt
the result of
shame
Aquinas
, gnawing feeling.
Freud
, conflict between
3
parts.
Fletcher
a
verb
rather than a noun
it is something you do when you make
decisions
situational and relative
a way of describing how we respond to an ethical issue
Fromm
(
psychological
view)
a fear of displeasing
authority
, leading to guilt.
Fromm’s conscience types
the
authoritarian
conscience -
conscience begins with a fear of authority.
the
humanistic
conscience -
our own inner voice reacting to how well we are functioning in life, a reaction to ourselves to our own behaviour.
ratio
innate reason
synderesis rule
“to do
good
and avoid
evil”
ld
the part of the mind that seeks pleasure
Super-ego
the part of the mind that contradicts the
id
, it uses internalised ideals from
parents
to make the ego behave morally
Ego
the mediation between the
id
and the
super-ego
Conscientia
a person’s
reason
makes
moral
judgements
Vincible ignorance
a lack of knowledge a person is responsible for, thus they can be blamed
Invincible ignorance
a
lack
of
knowledge
a person is
not
responsible
for, thus they cannot be
blamed
Aquinas - is conscience from god ? YES
god and religion bring human wholeness
helps us to become better people
innate
allows us to use reason
imago dei
theological approach
Freud
- is
conscience
from god ? NO
god is human invention, to give us comfort when facing our dangerous world
no proof of God’s existence
religion based on God caused
neuroses
and prevents us from becoming psychologically whole
psychological approach
Aquinas
theological approach
the
voice of god
use reason to make decisions
synderesis
rule
vincible/invincible ignorance
ratio
is innate due to
imago dei
linked to reason
not products of the
unconscious mind
Freud
psychological approach
the voice of
parents
3 parts of the mind
Horse and Rider analogy
not linked to reason
product of the
unconscious mind
a phenomenon, it doesn’t actually exist
an umbrella term for factors such as culture, environment, genetics, and education
J.H. Newman
voice of God
Fletcher
a
verb
Aquinas and Aristotle
reason
Aquinas on guilt
guilt would nearly be a by product of acting avid t the way your
conscience
directs you
Freud on guilt
conscience
is guilt but not objective guilt, it is a psychological phenomenon that we might overcome as our guilt is not necessarily logical