As socialcognition refers to how an individual becomes aware of how they fit into a socialworld, Selman (1980) suggests that to appreciate another person’s point of view, we must understand that not everyone thinks the same.
Selman (1980) investigated socialcognition using role-taking interpersonal dilemmas. From this he established levels of interpersonal interactions, which he called perspectivetaking.
Interpersonal dilemmas are stories about people interacting with each other, which have different possible outcomes.
Level1 of Selman's Levels of Perspective Taking is the social-informational stage, where individuals can understand that others may have differentperspectives based on different information.
Level2 of Selman's Levels of Perspective Taking is the self-reflective stage, where individuals can understand that others may have different perspectives based on different beliefs or values.
Level0 of Selman's Levels of Perspective Taking is the egocentric stage, where individuals can only understand their ownperspective.
Selman's Levels of Perspective Taking provide a framework for understanding how individuals develop the ability to take the perspective of others and understand that different people may have differentthoughts and beliefs.
Level3 of Selman's Levels of Perspective Taking is the mutual stage, where individuals can understand that others may have different perspectives based on mutual perspectives and can engage in reciprocalrole-taking.
Level4 of Selman's Levels of Perspective Taking is the societal stage, where individuals can understand that others may have different perspectives based on societalnorms, values, and roles.
Selman (1980) proposed that there are differentlevels of perspectivetaking in interpersonalinteractions.
Level0 is the egocentric viewpoint (3-6 years) where a child can label other people’s obvious feelings but do not see the cause of those feelings.
Level1 is the socialinformationalroletaking stage (6-8 years) where children know other people may have differentinformation and may or may not agree with them.
Level2 is the self-reflectiveroletaking stage (8-10 years) where children can see other people’s viewpoints, but not at the same time as their own.
Level3 is the mutualroletaking stage (10-12 years) where children can see the mutual and simultaneousviewpoints of others.
Level4 is the socialandconventionalsystem role taking stage (12-15+ years) where children realise that society has a view and a set of values/ norms that should be obeyed.
Gurucharri & Selman (1982) tested the interpersonal dilemmas in a longitudinal study over 5years with 41 children. They found that 40/41 children developed perspectivetaking as predicted by the Levels theory.
Epley et al (2004) found that egocentric errors decline with age, supporting the levels of perspectivetaking idea.
Selman (1970) looked at changes that occurred with age, in children’s responses to scenarios in which they were asked to take the role of different people in a socialsituation.
Selman (1971) investigated perspective taking using a sample of 30 girls and 30 boys. They were split into three groups of 20 based on their age; 4, 5 or 6 years. The children were tested individually and given a task to measure perspective taking.
Selman (1971) used scenarios which required children to consider how each of the people in the situation felt. Selman found that the level of perspectivetaking correlated with age, suggesting a clear developmental sequence.
Selman believed that development through his stages is based on maturity and experience.
Selman used his perspectivetaking research to formulate a stage theory, using a series of developmental levels.
Selman used the term ‘role-taking’ to explain how taking the role of another person allows a child to see behaviour from a differentperspective.