Jarratt (2012) says we are capable of understanding actions that we are unable to perform, without needing mirrorneurons.
Hickok (2014) believes the function of mirrorneurons is not about understanding the actions of others, but about using others to make our own choices how to act.
Hamilton (2012) conducted a meta-analysis of 25 studies and concluded that there was little evidence for a global dysfunction of the mirrorneuronsystem in those with autism.
Heyes (2012) says that we do not know whether mirrorneurons have evolved to help us understand each other’s actions or whether they are the after-effect, which is the brain’sresponse.
Most of the research into mirrorneurons studied the brains of animals which cannot be generalised to humans.
The research into mirrorneurons is difficult, costly and involves scientificequipment which lacksexternalvalidity.
Haker et al (2012) scanned the brains of people as they watched a film of people yawning. They saw more activity in the area associated with mirrorneurons, when the participants yawned in response.
Lacoboni et al (2005) showed activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (rich in mirrorneurons), increased when participants tried to understand the intentions behind an action.
According to Bekkali et al (2019) there is no direct evidence for mirrorneurons in humans, as there is no 'gold standard' way of measuring them.
Nishitani et al (2004) used scanning techniques to show how brainactivity was lower in people with autism compared to that of neurotypical individuals.
Hadjikhani (2007) provide support for a link between autism and dysfunctions in the mirrorneuronsystem. Brain scans have shown smaller areas of the brain, rich in mirrorneurons in people with autism.
Hamilton (2013) concluded that evidence for mirrorneurons was inconsistent and hard to interpret.