excessive fear and anxiety triggered by an object, place or situation . The extent of the fear is out of proportion to any real danger presented by the phobic stimulus
-can be hard to look away from the stimulus as it allows us to react quickly to a threat but can cause us to loose concentration on other more important subject areas
irrational beliefs
-a person might have thoughts which are not true which puts pressure on the person
cognitive distortions
-perceptions may be inaccurate and unrealistic someone may see mushrooms as disgusting
flooding is an intense exposure to the phobicstimulus with no graduated exposure or escape opportunities
-the idea is that anxiety cannot be sustained for a long period of time so the anxiety will subside and the person will relax and learn a new association with the stimulus
the patient may achieve relaxation because they have exhausted their fear response
this is called extinction in classical conditioning
-gilroy et al showed that the effects are long lasting, he followed 42 patients who were treated for a spider phobia vs a control group not taught relaxation techniques, at 3 months and 33 months the systematic desensitisation group were less fearful
-it is suitable for most people, flooding + cognitive therapies may not be good for people eg with learning difficulties who cant engage with the tough mental tasks or understand why its good to experience the anxiety
-its been suggested that SD may not be appropriate to treat phobias that have an underlying evolutionary survival component eg heights/snakes and it is better for treating phobias that were caused by personal experience
(weakness for both)
-frued argued that symptom substitution would play a role, a displacement of anxiety from a real source eg death to one easier to deal with eg zombies. This limits behavioural therapies as the treatment does not address the underlying cause
-choy et al suggested it is more effective than other methods whilst other research suggests it is equally effective
it is cost effective and quicker than alternatives
-as it can be completed days quicker than SD, often taking only 2 sessions rather than SD takes 10+ this means more people can be treated in the same time
-treatment can be fightening and unpleasant, for young children + people with learning difficulties may not understand why they are being exposed
-some patients will refuse to flood so time and money is wasted
its less effective for social phobias
-as they often involve cognitive aspects such as irrational thinking and they would benefit from more cognitive therapy
(weakness for both)
-frued argued that symptom substitution would play a role, a displacement of anxiety from a real source eg death to one easier to deal with eg zombies. This limits behavioural therapies as the treatment does not address the underlying cause
It can be applied to behavioral therapy in order to treat phobias
-behavioural therapies eg systematic desensitisation aim to decondition phobias by gradually reducing phobic anxiety through classical conditioning where a new positive responce to the stimulus is learned
it ignores cognitive factors, as there are cognitive aspects to phobias that cannot be traditionally explained
- cognitive factors such as irrational thoughts cannot be explained by the 2 process model, irrational thoughts can trigger anxiety
it does not factor in biological factors for phobias
- bounton points out that evolutionary factors may have a role in phobias as we easily aquire phobias that pose a danger to us like heights so we will have evolved to be afraid of these things
-this has been described as biological prepardness- the inate predisposition to aquire certain fears
some phobias appear to be aquired by social learning
-a child might see a parent react with fear to a stimulus which might trigger the child to imitate this behaviour as the parents are a model for them