involves making participants aware of the aims of the research, the procedures, their rights
including the right to withdraw
what their data will be used for
px should then make an informed judgement whether or not to take part without being coerced or feeling obliged
From the researcher's point of view, asking for informed consent may make the study meaningless because participants' behaviour will not be 'natural' as they know the aims of the study.
Dealing with informed consent
a consentletter or form detailing all relevant information that might affect their decision to participate
if the px agrees, this is then signed
for investigations involving children under 16, a signature of parental consent is required
Presumptive consent
rather than getting consent from the participants themselves, a similargroup of people are asked if the study is acceptable
if this group agrees, then consent of the original participants is 'presumed'
Priorgeneral consent
px give their permission to take part in a number of different studies - including one that will involve deception
by consenting, participants are effectively consenting to be deceived
Retrospective consent
px are asked for their consent (during debriefing) having already taken part in the study
they may not have been aware of their participation or they may have been subject to deception
Deception
deliberately misleading or withholdinginformation from participants at any stage of the investigation
Px who have not received adequate information when they agreed to take part (or worse, have been deliberately lied to) cannot be said to have given informed consent
There are occasions when deception can be justified if it does not cause the participant undue distress
Dealing with deception
px should be given a fulldebrief, made aware of the true aims of the investigation and any details they were not supplied with during the study, such as the existence of other groups or experimental conditions
should also be told what their data will be used for
must be given the right to withdraw during the study and the right to withholddata if they wish
important if retrospective consent is a feature of the study
Protection from harm
px should not be placed at any more risk than they would be in their daily lives, and should be protected from physical and psychological harm
the latter includes being made to feel embarrassed, inadequate or being placed under undue stress or pressure
reminded of the fact that they have the right to withdraw
Dealing with protection from harm
Px should be reassured that their behaviour was typical or normal
In extreme cases, if participants have been subject to stress or embarrassment, they may require counselling, which the researcher should provide
Privacy and confidentiality
Px have the right to control information about themselves - the right of privacy
If this is invaded then confidentiality should be protected
Confidentiality refers to our right, enshrined in law under the Data Protection Act, to have any personal data protected
The right to privacy extends to the area where the study took place such that institutions or geographical locations are not named
Dealing with confidentiality
If personal details are held these must be protected
However it is more usual to simply record no personal details, i.e. maintain anonymity
Researchers usually refer to participants using numbers or initials when writing up the investigation
In a casestudy, psychologists often use initials when describing the individual or individuals involved
Standard practice that during briefing and debriefing, participants are reminded that their data will be protected throughout the process and told that the data will not be shared with other researchers