Needs at the bottom are known as ‘deficiency needs’ they are designed to reduce inadequacies and the top levels are ‘growthneeds’ as they are designed to promote personal growth.
These needs are like vitamins. We can never be healthy without them and a long-term ‘deficiency’ can encourage mental health problems.
You need to satisfy lower level needs to move upwards.
What does Maslows hierarchy of needs mean? (part 2)
Maslow suggests that moments of achievement, ecstasy or elation were when all needs were met. These are ‘peak experiences’.
Negative life experiences such as job loss, or divorce can cause fluctuations between the levels.
What is self actualization?
The uppermost level of Maslow’shierarchy of needs
All the other needs must be met before self actualisation is possible
An ultimate feeling of well being and satisfaction, a feeling of ‘completeness’
Everyone has an innate drive to self-actualise and achieve this in our individual ways
There is a positive correlation between an individuals level of self actualisation and their psychological health
Self actualization and Rogers
Rogers said in order to achieve self-actualisation a person must first be congruent.
This means that their ideal self and real self are the same/very similar.
This then allows a person to have high feelings of self worth.
Self actualization and Rogers (part 2)
To achieve congruence, a person must have positive self regard.
If the gap between a persons self concept (real self) and ideal self is too big, the person experiences incongruence and self actualisation isn’t possible (due to low self esteem/negative feelings about one’s self).
Conditions of worth- Rogers
Rogers believed that conditional love (when you are not accepted for who you are + doing what others want you to do/be) leads to conditions of worth.
’I will only love you if….’’ can lead to a sense of worthlessness and low self esteem ( therefore a person is unable to reach self actualisation).
Unconditional positive regard (being accepted for who you are) is needed for positive mental health, and the ability to self-actualise.
Evaluation - one strength
The humanistic approach is anti-reductionist (holistic)
Humanistic psychologists reject any attempt to break up behaviour and experience into smaller components
They advocate holism – the idea that subjective experience can only be understood by considering the whole person (their relationships, past, present and future and more.)
Considers meaningful human behaviour within its real-world context so has more validity than its alternatives
Evaluation- one weakness
Humanistic psychology has few concepts that can be reduced to single variables and measured, unlike behaviourism
This means that humanistic psychology in general is short on empirical evidence to support its claims.
Evaluation - Stengths
Humanistic psychologists have been praised for promoting a positive image of the human condition – seeing people as in control of their lives and having freedom to change
Freud saw human beings as slaves to their past and claimed all of us existed somewhere between ‘common unhappiness and absolute despair’
Therefore humanistic psychology offers a refreshing and optimistic alternative.
Evaluation - Weaknesses
May have a Western culture bias
Many humanistic ideas (such as self-actualisation) would be more associated with individualistic cultures in the West
Collectivist cultures (such as India, which emphasise the needs of the group) may not identify so easily with the ideals and values of humanistic psychology
It is possible that the approach does not apply universally and is a product of the cultural context in which it was developed.