"We're not criminals we're respectable citizens, you know"

• Analysis 


  Gerald’s defense of his respectability contrasts sharply with the inspector’s view that "there’s not as much difference as you think." This moment reveals Gerald's belief in his own moral superiority due to his class and social standing. However, the inspector’s response challenges this view, suggesting that actions like Gerald’s exploitation of Eva are morally and socially reprehensible, even if they aren't technically criminal.
• Alternative interpretation 


  One could argue that Gerald's insistence on his respectability is a reflection of the hypocrisy embedded in the capitalist system. He tries to distance himself from criminality by emphasizing his wealth and class, despite his actions being morally questionable. This suggests that the legal system upholds the privileges of the wealthy, allowing them to avoid consequences for their exploitative actions. 
• Themes


  Capitalism: Gerald’s defence of his respectability illustrates how wealth and social status serve as protection from moral accountability, revealing the class-based inequalities that were prevalent in 1912.

  Social Responsibility: This moment highlights the tension between individual responsibility and societal expectations, particularly how the upper class is often excused from scrutiny despite harmful actions. 
• Writers intention 


  Priestley uses Gerald’s words to critique the entrenched class divides and the hypocrisy of the social system. Through the inspector’s response, he challenges the audience to question whether the upper class should be immune from the consequences of their actions and to reflect on the need for greater social responsibility.