Validity is the legitimacy of a method or finding and the extent to which the experiment has measured or can measure what it sets out to
Internal Validity is whether the effects observed in a experiment are due to manipulation of independent variable and not another factor
External validity focuses on factors outside of the experiment e.g. setting, population
Population validity is the extent to which the findings can be generalised to the wider population
Ecological validity is the extent to which findings can be generalised to other settings/situations
Temporal validity is the extent to which findings can be generalised to other times/eras e.g. Freud in the Victorian era
Validity can be assessed using face validity or concurrent validity
Face validity is where a measure is scrutinised to determine whether it appears to measure what its supposed to - by either 'eyeballing' the measuring instrument or passing it to an expert
Concurrent validity is the extent to which a psychological measure relates to an existing similar measure using a recognised or well-established test
High concurrence is considered above 0.80
In experiments validity can be improved by using a control group and standardised procedure to determine the effect of the IV, and single rdouble blind trials to reduce demand characteristics and researcher bias
In questionaires validity can be improved by incorporating a lie scale to control effects of social desirability bias, and to keep results anyonymous
In observations validity can be improved by ensuring behavioural categories are not ambiguous and do not overlap
In qualitative research validity can be improved by demonstrating interpretive validity through coherence of researcher's narrative, triangulation
Predicitive validity is where scores on a test are used to predict future behaviour by correlating with some criteria you would expect it to predict
Interpretive validity is the extent to which the researcher's narrative matches that of their participants