Then further amended by the coroners and justice act 2009
S.52(1)
D suffers from an "abnormality of mental functioning"
R v Byrnes- "inability to controlurges
Lord Parker- abnormality is "a stateofmind so different from that of ordinaryhumanbeings that the reasonableperson would seeit as abnormal"
S.52(1)(A)
Only acceptable if it arises from a "recognised medical condition"
Chronic depression- Gittens 1984
Mental Deficiency- Speake 1957
Pre-menstrual tensions- Smith 1982
Battered woman syndrome- Ahluwalia 1993
NOT ACCEPTED- morbid jealousy- Vinagre 1979
All of those found in the WHO list of classified diseases ICD-10
The abnormality must have:
S.52(1)(B)
to understandthenature of D'sconduct
to formrational judgement
to exerciseselfcontrol
It has to be substantial impairment for the defence to occur
Egan (1992)- "substantial" is "more than trivialdegree of impairment which does not make any appreciable difference to a persons ability to control himself, but it means less than total impairment"
S.52(1)(c)
the abnormalityprovides an explanation for D'sacts and omissions.
Also includes the problem of intoxication
Would the D's responsibility still be impaired if they weresober
separate the intoxication from the D.R (R v Gittens) (R v Diestschmann)
Drunkenness is not a case of diminishedresponsibility
However,
Tandy (1988)- if alcoholismcaused brain damage then that is a recognisedmedicalcondition