physical fieldwork

• Site 1 depth = 0.21m, Site 3 depth = 0.22m
• Width increases from 2m to 7m downstream, fitting the Bradshaw model
• Site 2 depth anomaly due to meander bend and greater velocity on the outside, leading to greater energy and erosion
• Anomaly at Site 2 depth = 0.75m near the left bank
• Site 1 depth = 0.21m, Site 3 depth = 0.22m
• River width increases downstream as discharge increases, indicating more energy for erosion
• Site 1 depth = 0.21m, Site 3 depth = 0.22m
• Anomaly at Site 2 depth = 0.75m near the left bank
• Site 1 depth = 0.21m, Site 3 depth = 0.22m
• Anomaly at Site 2 depth = 0.75m near the left bank
• River width increases downstream as discharge increases, indicating more energy for erosion
• Width increases from 2m to 7m downstream, fitting the Bradshaw model
• Site 1 depth = 0.21m, Site 3 depth = 0.22m
• Site 2 depth anomaly due to meander bend and greater velocity on the outside, leading to greater energy and erosion
• Anomaly at Site 2 depth = 0.75m near the left bank
• Anomaly at Site 2 depth = 0.75m near the left bank
• River width increases downstream as discharge increases, indicating more energy for erosion
• Site 1 depth = 0.21m, Site 3 depth = 0.22m
• Site 2 depth anomaly due to meander bend and greater velocity on the outside, leading to greater energy and erosion
• Width increases from 2m to 7m downstream, fitting the Bradshaw model
• Anomaly at Site 2 depth = 0.75m near the left bank
• Width increases from 2m to 7m downstream, fitting the Bradshaw model
• River width increases as discharge increases, indicating more energy for erosion
• Site 2 depth anomaly due to meander bend and greater velocity on the outside, leading to greater energy and erosion