To see whether children will imitate aggressive behaviour even if in different environment and without a role model present
What were the hypotheses?
Children shown aggressive models will show more aggressive acts resembling those of the models rather than those shown non-aggressive or no models
Children shown non-aggressive models will show less aggressive behaviours than those shown aggressive or no models
Boys will show more imitative aggression than girls
Children will imitate the same sex model behaviour to a greater degree than the opposite sex’s behaviours
What is the method?
Lab experiment with observation, independent measures, matched pairs
What is the sample?
72, 3-5 year olds (36 boys and 36 girls) from Stanford University School
Matched through a procedure that rated them on their level of aggression by the experimenter and nursery school teacher on a 5 point scale
Scale measured both verbal and physical aggression towards inanimate objects
Randomly assigned to conditions
What were the IVs and the DV?
IV – Role Model:
Whether child witnessed an aggressive or non aggressive adult model
Control – not exposed to an adult model
IV – Sex of role model:
Male or female role model
IV - Sex of child:
Male or female
DV:
Amount of imitative behaviour and aggression measured by a male model and another observer noting down at a 5 second interval through a one way mirror
Physical act – acts imitated such as hitting Bobo over the head with mallet
Verbal act – phrases imitated “Pow”
What happened in the modelling phase?
Child taken individually
Table on corner where child sits making a picture out of stickers and potato prints
Opposite corner model sits playing quietly with toys and has a 5ftBobo doll and mallet
After 5 mins the model turns to the Bobo and sits on it and starts punching and kicking it
Done 3 times with phrases such as “pow” and “hit him down”
What happens in the aggressive arousal phase?
Attractive toys in room e.g. fire engine, dolls, baby crib
After 2 mins experimenter said the toys were reserved for other children
What happens in the delayed imitation phase?
Room with aggressive toys such as mallet and 3ft Bobo doll as well as non-aggressive toys such as a tea set and paper and crayons
Observed through a one-way mirror by the male model and a second observer who was present for half of the participants
They didn’t know whether the child was in the experimental or control condition
Time sampling every 5 seconds
What were the behaviour codes in the observation?
Imitative aggression responses
Physical – specific acts imitated
Verbal aggression – any phrases imitated
2. Partially imitative responses
Mallet aggression – mallet on toys rather than Bobo
Sits on Bobo doll but not behaving aggressively
3. Nonimitative aggressive responses
Punch, strike, slap Bobo doll
Aggressive behaviour directed at toys rather than Bobo
Saying hostile things not said by Bobo
Aggressive gun play
4. Non verbal responses
Saying “He keepscomingbackformore”
What were the results?
Children in the aggressive condition showed significantly more imitation of physical and verbal aggressive behaviour
Boys produced more aggressive imitation than girls
The behaviour of the male model exerted greater influence than the male model
What were the conclusions?
Children learn behaviour through observation and imitation
Boys and girls likely to learn verbal aggression from same-sex adult
How is the study useful?
Parenting – influence a paternal figure has over children
Nurseries
What was the background?
Classical conditioning is a technique used in behavioural therapy in which a naturally occurring stimuli is paired with a response. Operant conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through reward and punishment. Social learning theory thinks that children learn through observation and if children identify with an adult then they adopt their behaviour. Negative reinforcement is where you are rewarded for a behaviour. Positive reinforcement is where you are punished for a behaviour